"I am truly free only when all human beings, men and women, are equally free. The freedom of other men, far from negating or limiting my freedom, is, on the contrary, its necessary premise and confirmation"
About this Quote
Freedom, for Bakunin, isn’t a private possession you lock in a safe; it’s a social condition you either share or you don’t have. The line is built like a philosophical trap for the liberal fantasy of autonomy: if your liberty depends on someone else’s subordination, then what you’re calling freedom is just permission granted by a hierarchy. Bakunin flips the usual zero-sum story, insisting that another person’s emancipation doesn’t crowd your space but expands the very world in which you can move without fear, coercion, or debt.
The intent is polemical and tactical. As a revolutionary anarchist writing in the shadow of monarchies, industrial capitalism, and the disciplined machinery of the modern state, Bakunin is arguing against two enemies at once: the conservative order that openly relies on domination, and the supposedly liberatory politics that smuggle domination back in through “temporary” authority. His subtext is clear: any revolution that keeps bosses, bureaucrats, or “guardians of the people” intact will recreate unfreedom under a new flag.
The inclusion of “men and women” is not ornamental. It signals that freedom can’t be partitioned into respectable categories (political rights here, gender hierarchy there) without becoming fraudulent. Rhetorically, the sentence works because it turns solidarity from moral nicety into self-interest: the freedom of others is not charity; it’s the proof that your own freedom isn’t conditional, revocable, or built on someone else’s silence.
The intent is polemical and tactical. As a revolutionary anarchist writing in the shadow of monarchies, industrial capitalism, and the disciplined machinery of the modern state, Bakunin is arguing against two enemies at once: the conservative order that openly relies on domination, and the supposedly liberatory politics that smuggle domination back in through “temporary” authority. His subtext is clear: any revolution that keeps bosses, bureaucrats, or “guardians of the people” intact will recreate unfreedom under a new flag.
The inclusion of “men and women” is not ornamental. It signals that freedom can’t be partitioned into respectable categories (political rights here, gender hierarchy there) without becoming fraudulent. Rhetorically, the sentence works because it turns solidarity from moral nicety into self-interest: the freedom of others is not charity; it’s the proof that your own freedom isn’t conditional, revocable, or built on someone else’s silence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mikhail
Add to List








