"I and my colleagues here have been engaged in the pursuit of knowledge"
About this Quote
There is a kind of radical modesty in Sanger’s phrasing: “I and my colleagues” before anything else, then the deliberately plain “have been engaged,” as if the work were less a heroic breakthrough than a steady, shared occupation. For a scientist who helped invent modern genetics’ grammar, it’s a telling choice to make discovery sound like craftsmanship. The line refuses the lone-genius myth and quietly reassigns credit to the lab bench, the instrument room, the graduate student’s patience, the invisible labor that turns hunches into results.
“Pursuit of knowledge” is old-fashioned on purpose. It reaches back to a humanistic ideal of science as a public good rather than a product pipeline. Sanger is staking out an ethic: knowledge isn’t “captured” or “extracted,” it’s pursued - implying uncertainty, detours, and the humility of being led by evidence. Even the passive, measured cadence signals a worldview where claims should be proportionate to proof. No hype, no personal brand, no conquest metaphors.
The context matters: Sanger worked in an era when “Big Science” was accelerating, funding and prestige were rising, and scientific authority was becoming culturally central. This sentence reads like a quiet corrective to that inflation. It also subtly shields the work from politicization: he frames the enterprise as collective and epistemic, not ideological. The intent isn’t to dazzle; it’s to normalize a virtue - that the most transformative advances often arrive dressed as routine diligence.
“Pursuit of knowledge” is old-fashioned on purpose. It reaches back to a humanistic ideal of science as a public good rather than a product pipeline. Sanger is staking out an ethic: knowledge isn’t “captured” or “extracted,” it’s pursued - implying uncertainty, detours, and the humility of being led by evidence. Even the passive, measured cadence signals a worldview where claims should be proportionate to proof. No hype, no personal brand, no conquest metaphors.
The context matters: Sanger worked in an era when “Big Science” was accelerating, funding and prestige were rising, and scientific authority was becoming culturally central. This sentence reads like a quiet corrective to that inflation. It also subtly shields the work from politicization: he frames the enterprise as collective and epistemic, not ideological. The intent isn’t to dazzle; it’s to normalize a virtue - that the most transformative advances often arrive dressed as routine diligence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Frederick
Add to List




