"I began composing works which were imitative of the music I was being told about. I was also very interested in translating the music into visual terms"
About this Quote
Flynt is admitting, almost offhandedly, that his early creativity wasn’t born from pristine inspiration but from a kind of secondhand listening: music “I was being told about.” That phrasing matters. It points to a scene where information circulates as reputation, theory, liner-note lore, and gatekept expertise. Before you even hear the sound, you’re hearing the story of the sound. His “imitative” compositions aren’t a confession of unoriginality so much as a diagnosis of how avant-garde culture often works: a chain of descriptions, endorsements, and myths that shape the work as much as the work itself.
The move to “translating the music into visual terms” is where Flynt quietly pivots from disciple to insurgent. Translation isn’t decoration; it’s a challenge to medium purity. If sound can be thought of as image, then the usual hierarchies (composer over listener, music over “mere” illustration) start to wobble. That’s consistent with Flynt’s broader stance as an artist-philosopher who circled Fluxus, conceptual art, and downtown experimentalism while remaining suspicious of art-world sanctimony.
Subtext: he’s mapping how cognition precedes perception. You don’t just experience a piece; you’re primed by the discourse around it. By turning music into something you can see, Flynt exposes that mediation and makes it material. The intent isn’t to romanticize synesthesia; it’s to show that imitation and cross-medium translation can be tools of critique, a way to reveal who gets to define what “serious” music is before anyone hears a note.
The move to “translating the music into visual terms” is where Flynt quietly pivots from disciple to insurgent. Translation isn’t decoration; it’s a challenge to medium purity. If sound can be thought of as image, then the usual hierarchies (composer over listener, music over “mere” illustration) start to wobble. That’s consistent with Flynt’s broader stance as an artist-philosopher who circled Fluxus, conceptual art, and downtown experimentalism while remaining suspicious of art-world sanctimony.
Subtext: he’s mapping how cognition precedes perception. You don’t just experience a piece; you’re primed by the discourse around it. By turning music into something you can see, Flynt exposes that mediation and makes it material. The intent isn’t to romanticize synesthesia; it’s to show that imitation and cross-medium translation can be tools of critique, a way to reveal who gets to define what “serious” music is before anyone hears a note.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Henry
Add to List







