"I believe in imagination. I did Kramer vs. Kramer before I had children. But the mother I would be was already inside me"
About this Quote
Acting, in Streep's framing, isn't pretend so much as premonition. The line lands because it reverses a familiar narrative about motherhood: that having children unlocks some brand-new, instinctive self. Streep argues the opposite. The identity we treat as earned through experience can be accessed through imagination first, and experience later merely verifies what was already emotionally legible.
The context matters. Kramer vs. Kramer sits at the hinge point of late-70s American gender politics, when divorce, custody, and the "working mother" were becoming mainstream anxieties rather than private scandals. Streep played Joanna, a character long treated as a cultural villain: the woman who leaves. By saying "the mother I would be was already inside me", Streep quietly defends the performance against the charge of falseness. She didn't need biographical credentials to render maternal ambivalence, guilt, and longing; she needed attention, empathy, and nerve.
There's subtext here about artistic authority, too. Female performers are routinely asked to authenticate their work with their bodies - have you suffered, have you birthed, have you lived it? Streep rejects that gatekeeping without turning motherhood into mere research. She insists on an interior continuity: a self with depth, contradictions, and latent futures. The sentence is both a tribute to imagination and a warning about how easily we flatten women into milestones. In her mouth, imagination becomes a form of knowledge - not airy, but predictive, almost muscular.
The context matters. Kramer vs. Kramer sits at the hinge point of late-70s American gender politics, when divorce, custody, and the "working mother" were becoming mainstream anxieties rather than private scandals. Streep played Joanna, a character long treated as a cultural villain: the woman who leaves. By saying "the mother I would be was already inside me", Streep quietly defends the performance against the charge of falseness. She didn't need biographical credentials to render maternal ambivalence, guilt, and longing; she needed attention, empathy, and nerve.
There's subtext here about artistic authority, too. Female performers are routinely asked to authenticate their work with their bodies - have you suffered, have you birthed, have you lived it? Streep rejects that gatekeeping without turning motherhood into mere research. She insists on an interior continuity: a self with depth, contradictions, and latent futures. The sentence is both a tribute to imagination and a warning about how easily we flatten women into milestones. In her mouth, imagination becomes a form of knowledge - not airy, but predictive, almost muscular.
Quote Details
| Topic | Mother |
|---|
More Quotes by Meryl
Add to List



