"I believe in working in a bipartisan manner"
About this Quote
“I believe in working in a bipartisan manner” is the kind of sentence that tries to sound like a value and functions like a credential. Coming from Erskine Bowles - a business-forward Democratic operator best known in modern politics as a deficit hawk and co-chair of the Simpson-Bowles commission - “bipartisan” isn’t just a civics buzzword. It’s a brand: competence over ideology, deal-making over purity tests, balance sheets over battle cries.
The specific intent is reassurance. To centrists, donors, and institutional gatekeepers, bipartisan signals that the speaker won’t scorch the earth, won’t spook markets, and won’t treat politics as moral warfare. It frames negotiation as maturity, and gridlock as a technical problem that can be solved by adults in the room. That’s a powerful pose in a culture that is exhausted by constant conflict - and it subtly positions opponents as children if they refuse to play.
The subtext is where the stakes live. Bipartisanship is often invoked when someone wants to shift the conversation from “who wins” to “what’s reasonable,” and “reasonable” tends to mean “closer to the center of existing power.” For a businessman-statesman type, it can also mean importing corporate norms into governance: compromise as a KPI, consensus as risk management.
Context matters because “bipartisan” has become both aspiration and cudgel in an era when the parties don’t just disagree on policy but on reality. Bowles is betting that procedural virtue still persuades. The line works because it’s hard to argue against in public - and because it lets the speaker define pragmatism on his own terms.
The specific intent is reassurance. To centrists, donors, and institutional gatekeepers, bipartisan signals that the speaker won’t scorch the earth, won’t spook markets, and won’t treat politics as moral warfare. It frames negotiation as maturity, and gridlock as a technical problem that can be solved by adults in the room. That’s a powerful pose in a culture that is exhausted by constant conflict - and it subtly positions opponents as children if they refuse to play.
The subtext is where the stakes live. Bipartisanship is often invoked when someone wants to shift the conversation from “who wins” to “what’s reasonable,” and “reasonable” tends to mean “closer to the center of existing power.” For a businessman-statesman type, it can also mean importing corporate norms into governance: compromise as a KPI, consensus as risk management.
Context matters because “bipartisan” has become both aspiration and cudgel in an era when the parties don’t just disagree on policy but on reality. Bowles is betting that procedural virtue still persuades. The line works because it’s hard to argue against in public - and because it lets the speaker define pragmatism on his own terms.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Erskine
Add to List





