"I believe sincerely that we should bring in U.N. peacekeepers and bring our troops home"
About this Quote
A line like this isn’t just anti-war; it’s a bid to change who gets to define “security.” Kucinich’s phrasing is careful in a way that reveals the political math. “I believe sincerely” functions as preemptive defense against the standard hit job: naive, soft, unserious. He knows the charge is coming, so he steps out first, framing his position as moral conviction rather than partisan reflex.
The real pivot is the swap of uniforms. “Bring in U.N. peacekeepers” isn’t merely a logistical suggestion; it’s an argument about legitimacy. U.S. troops symbolize unilateral power and open-ended occupation. U.N. peacekeepers, however imperfect, signal multilateral oversight and a different set of incentives: de-escalation, elections, ceasefires, the slow bureaucracy of not winning. Kucinich is trying to rebrand withdrawal not as retreat but as a handoff to an institution built to launder conflict through international consent.
“Bring our troops home” does double duty: it’s a kitchen-table promise to families and a rhetorical jailbreak from abstract geopolitics. The possessive “our” claims patriotic ownership over the soldiers, implying that keeping them abroad is a kind of misappropriation.
Contextually, this is peak early-2000s dissident politics: Iraq-era fatigue, mounting casualties, and a Democratic Party torn between hawkish credibility and anti-war base energy. Kucinich is staking out the unpopular clarity others flirted with, betting that moral coherence could outlast the news cycle’s appetite for toughness.
The real pivot is the swap of uniforms. “Bring in U.N. peacekeepers” isn’t merely a logistical suggestion; it’s an argument about legitimacy. U.S. troops symbolize unilateral power and open-ended occupation. U.N. peacekeepers, however imperfect, signal multilateral oversight and a different set of incentives: de-escalation, elections, ceasefires, the slow bureaucracy of not winning. Kucinich is trying to rebrand withdrawal not as retreat but as a handoff to an institution built to launder conflict through international consent.
“Bring our troops home” does double duty: it’s a kitchen-table promise to families and a rhetorical jailbreak from abstract geopolitics. The possessive “our” claims patriotic ownership over the soldiers, implying that keeping them abroad is a kind of misappropriation.
Contextually, this is peak early-2000s dissident politics: Iraq-era fatigue, mounting casualties, and a Democratic Party torn between hawkish credibility and anti-war base energy. Kucinich is staking out the unpopular clarity others flirted with, betting that moral coherence could outlast the news cycle’s appetite for toughness.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Dennis
Add to List


