"I believe that in the end the abolition of war, the maintenance of world peace, the adjustment of international questions by pacific means will come through the force of public opinion, which controls nations and peoples"
About this Quote
Kellogg is selling an almost radical idea for a man of state: that the real superpower isn’t a navy or a treaty clause, but the crowd’s moral judgment. After World War I’s mechanized slaughter, the old language of “balance of power” sounded like a bureaucratic alibi. This line tries to swap that realism for a new engine of order: public opinion as a disciplining force that can make war politically illegible.
The intent is plainly aspirational, but it’s also tactical. Kellogg is arguing for legitimacy as leverage. If nations can be made to fear condemnation the way they fear sanctions, then peace becomes cheaper than conquest. The phrasing matters: “in the end” gives him room to be optimistic without promising immediate results; “adjustment” reduces geopolitical flashpoints to solvable disputes, a technocratic verb that tames the chaos of nationalism. “Pacific means” (not just “peaceful”) sounds procedural, as if diplomacy is a method that can be standardized.
The subtext, though, is a quiet bet on mass politics at a moment when mass politics was volatile. In the 1920s and 1930s, propaganda, radio, and new party movements were teaching governments how to manufacture “public opinion” as much as obey it. Kellogg frames opinion as something that “controls” peoples and nations, but control cuts both ways: publics can restrain leaders, or be mobilized into crusades.
Context sharpens the irony. Kellogg helped champion the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact, which renounced war as national policy. It was noble, headline-friendly, and widely signed. It also lacked enforcement, soon colliding with the decade’s aggressions. The quote captures the era’s faith that shame could substitute for power - a hope that was historically important, even when history refused to cooperate.
The intent is plainly aspirational, but it’s also tactical. Kellogg is arguing for legitimacy as leverage. If nations can be made to fear condemnation the way they fear sanctions, then peace becomes cheaper than conquest. The phrasing matters: “in the end” gives him room to be optimistic without promising immediate results; “adjustment” reduces geopolitical flashpoints to solvable disputes, a technocratic verb that tames the chaos of nationalism. “Pacific means” (not just “peaceful”) sounds procedural, as if diplomacy is a method that can be standardized.
The subtext, though, is a quiet bet on mass politics at a moment when mass politics was volatile. In the 1920s and 1930s, propaganda, radio, and new party movements were teaching governments how to manufacture “public opinion” as much as obey it. Kellogg frames opinion as something that “controls” peoples and nations, but control cuts both ways: publics can restrain leaders, or be mobilized into crusades.
Context sharpens the irony. Kellogg helped champion the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact, which renounced war as national policy. It was noble, headline-friendly, and widely signed. It also lacked enforcement, soon colliding with the decade’s aggressions. The quote captures the era’s faith that shame could substitute for power - a hope that was historically important, even when history refused to cooperate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Frank B. Kellogg, Nobel Lecture (Stockholm, Dec 10, 1929) — acceptance address for the 1929 Nobel Peace Prize; published text available on the Nobel Prize website. |
More Quotes by Frank
Add to List



