"I believe that this is a different war than America has ever fought in the past. It is a non-conventional war. It means that you've got to use every tool you've got available to you"
About this Quote
Shelton’s line reads like a calm briefing, but it’s doing aggressive political work: it stretches the definition of war so the rules can stretch with it. Calling it “different” and “non-conventional” isn’t just description; it’s a permission slip. If the battlefield is everywhere and the enemy doesn’t wear a uniform, then the familiar guardrails of conventional conflict - clear fronts, declared endpoints, visible combatants - start to look outdated, even inconvenient.
The phrase “every tool you’ve got available” is the real lever. It sounds pragmatic, almost managerial, but it smuggles in a maximalist premise: that anything the state can do is potentially relevant, and therefore potentially justified. “Tool” is a sanitized metaphor that blurs moral categories. A tool can be a diplomat, a drone, an economic sanction, a covert raid, a surveillance program. Once you accept the toolbox framing, debate shifts from “Should we do this?” to “Why would we leave a tool unused?”
Context matters. Shelton, as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in the late 1990s, is speaking from the hinge era between Cold War certainties and the post-9/11 security paradigm that would soon dominate. Even before the “Global War on Terror” became a slogan, the military establishment was already preparing the public for conflicts defined by networks, insurgencies, and ambiguity. The subtext: expect fewer neat victories, more open-ended mandates, and a broader fusion of military, intelligence, and domestic security power.
The phrase “every tool you’ve got available” is the real lever. It sounds pragmatic, almost managerial, but it smuggles in a maximalist premise: that anything the state can do is potentially relevant, and therefore potentially justified. “Tool” is a sanitized metaphor that blurs moral categories. A tool can be a diplomat, a drone, an economic sanction, a covert raid, a surveillance program. Once you accept the toolbox framing, debate shifts from “Should we do this?” to “Why would we leave a tool unused?”
Context matters. Shelton, as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in the late 1990s, is speaking from the hinge era between Cold War certainties and the post-9/11 security paradigm that would soon dominate. Even before the “Global War on Terror” became a slogan, the military establishment was already preparing the public for conflicts defined by networks, insurgencies, and ambiguity. The subtext: expect fewer neat victories, more open-ended mandates, and a broader fusion of military, intelligence, and domestic security power.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Hugh
Add to List





