"I believe the American people spoke loud and clear to the Bush Administration in yesterday's election that they disapprove of the current direction in the war in Iraq. As a result, the President wasted no time in dumping Secretary Rumsfeld"
About this Quote
Democracy has a way of speaking in euphemisms, and Jim Clyburn is translating the polite version into something blunter: the voters didn’t just register unease about Iraq, they handed George W. Bush a reprimand. The line works because it turns an election into a verdict and then dares the White House to acknowledge it. “Loud and clear” is doing strategic heavy lifting - an insistence that the message was unmistakable, not a muddle of partisan noise, and therefore demands consequence.
Clyburn’s timing matters. This lands in the aftermath of the 2006 midterms, when public patience with the Iraq War had collapsed and Democrats took control of Congress. In that setting, Donald Rumsfeld’s removal wasn’t merely a staffing change; it was the administration conceding, however reluctantly, that the war’s management had become politically radioactive. Clyburn frames it as cause-and-effect: the public speaks, the president reacts. That’s the intended narrative: elections still have teeth.
The subtext is sharper. “Dumping Secretary Rumsfeld” suggests a scapegoat dynamic - swift disposal to absorb public anger while preserving the presidency’s broader posture. It also lets Clyburn claim momentum without overstating power: Democrats can’t end the war outright, but they can force admissions, extract accountability, and reposition the debate. The sentence is a controlled triumphalism: not victory declared, but leverage announced.
Clyburn’s timing matters. This lands in the aftermath of the 2006 midterms, when public patience with the Iraq War had collapsed and Democrats took control of Congress. In that setting, Donald Rumsfeld’s removal wasn’t merely a staffing change; it was the administration conceding, however reluctantly, that the war’s management had become politically radioactive. Clyburn frames it as cause-and-effect: the public speaks, the president reacts. That’s the intended narrative: elections still have teeth.
The subtext is sharper. “Dumping Secretary Rumsfeld” suggests a scapegoat dynamic - swift disposal to absorb public anger while preserving the presidency’s broader posture. It also lets Clyburn claim momentum without overstating power: Democrats can’t end the war outright, but they can force admissions, extract accountability, and reposition the debate. The sentence is a controlled triumphalism: not victory declared, but leverage announced.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List

