"I can fairly be called an amateur because I do what I do, in the original sense of the word - for love, because I love it. On the other hand, I think that those of us who make our living writing history can also be called true professionals"
About this Quote
McCullough pulls off a neat rhetorical two-step: he embraces “amateur” as a badge of integrity, then reclaims “professional” as a badge of responsibility. The pivot turns on etymology - amateur as “lover” - which isn’t pedantry so much as a values statement. He’s drawing a boundary between careerism and craft, suggesting that the best work begins in fascination, not in résumé maintenance.
The subtext is defensive and strategic. McCullough spent a career as a bestselling historian who lived partly outside the academy, often facing the insinuation that “popular” equals “soft.” By calling himself an amateur “in the original sense,” he refuses the modern insult embedded in the term (untrained, unserious) and replaces it with a more bracing standard: devotion. Love, here, isn’t sentimentality; it’s stamina - the willingness to stay with the sources, the scenes, the language long after the glamour fades.
Then he lands the second point: making a living writing history doesn’t cheapen that love; it formalizes it. “True professionals” signals ethics: deadlines met, facts checked, prose polished, readers respected. He’s also quietly widening the tent. Professionalism isn’t owned by credentialed gatekeepers; it’s earned through disciplined labor and public accountability.
Context matters: late-20th-century history writing became a battleground between specialized scholarship and narrative storytelling. McCullough argues you can be both: romantically committed to the past, and rigorously answerable for how you sell it to the present.
The subtext is defensive and strategic. McCullough spent a career as a bestselling historian who lived partly outside the academy, often facing the insinuation that “popular” equals “soft.” By calling himself an amateur “in the original sense,” he refuses the modern insult embedded in the term (untrained, unserious) and replaces it with a more bracing standard: devotion. Love, here, isn’t sentimentality; it’s stamina - the willingness to stay with the sources, the scenes, the language long after the glamour fades.
Then he lands the second point: making a living writing history doesn’t cheapen that love; it formalizes it. “True professionals” signals ethics: deadlines met, facts checked, prose polished, readers respected. He’s also quietly widening the tent. Professionalism isn’t owned by credentialed gatekeepers; it’s earned through disciplined labor and public accountability.
Context matters: late-20th-century history writing became a battleground between specialized scholarship and narrative storytelling. McCullough argues you can be both: romantically committed to the past, and rigorously answerable for how you sell it to the present.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List








