"I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future"
About this Quote
It reads like a resignation note written in the language of a campaign war room: not apology, not defiance, but triage. Van Jones isn’t inviting a debate over what he did or said; he’s declaring the argument itself a luxury the movement can’t afford. “In good conscience” frames the exit as moral responsibility, not capitulation. That phrase does quiet work: it signals integrity to supporters while conceding, implicitly, that the controversy is real enough to drain oxygen.
The real pivot is “precious time and energy.” Jones translates scandal into scarcity economics. Time is the only currency politics can’t print, and he’s telling “colleagues” to stop spending it on narrative cleanup. He also subtly shifts the burden away from himself: the problem isn’t merely his past, it’s the cost to the collective if they’re forced to “defend or explain” it. That pairing matters. “Defending” suggests combat; “explaining” suggests pedagogy. He’s saying both the brawl and the seminar are traps.
“All hands on deck” is purposeful cliché: a communal rallying cry that turns personal fallout into a shared mission, while “fighting for the future” wraps the retreat in forward motion. The subtext is pragmatic and unsentimental: modern politics punishes complexity, and the fastest way to protect an agenda is to remove the person who can be used to stall it. It’s activism reframed as damage control - not because the cause is weak, but because the media-cycle machinery is strong.
The real pivot is “precious time and energy.” Jones translates scandal into scarcity economics. Time is the only currency politics can’t print, and he’s telling “colleagues” to stop spending it on narrative cleanup. He also subtly shifts the burden away from himself: the problem isn’t merely his past, it’s the cost to the collective if they’re forced to “defend or explain” it. That pairing matters. “Defending” suggests combat; “explaining” suggests pedagogy. He’s saying both the brawl and the seminar are traps.
“All hands on deck” is purposeful cliché: a communal rallying cry that turns personal fallout into a shared mission, while “fighting for the future” wraps the retreat in forward motion. The subtext is pragmatic and unsentimental: modern politics punishes complexity, and the fastest way to protect an agenda is to remove the person who can be used to stall it. It’s activism reframed as damage control - not because the cause is weak, but because the media-cycle machinery is strong.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Van
Add to List









