"I cannot say whether things will get better if we change; what I can say is they must change if they are to get better"
About this Quote
Certainty is the one comfort Lichtenberg refuses to sell. The line opens by denying the neat, progress-therapy promise that change automatically improves anything: no guarantees, no inspirational curve trending upward. Coming from an Enlightenment-era scientist and aphorist, that skepticism reads like intellectual hygiene. He’s protecting the reader from the most common logical error in reform movements: mistaking motion for advancement.
Then he pivots with a deliberately asymmetrical claim: while improvement isn’t ensured by change, it is impossible without it. The rhetoric is cleanly scientific, almost experimental. Change is not the outcome; it’s the necessary condition. That structure matters. It allows him to be anti-utopian without being conservative, to reject naive optimism without granting veto power to inertia. In that tension sits the subtext: people often demand proof that change will work before they’ll risk it, but the demand itself is a stalling tactic when the status quo is already failing.
Context sharpens the point. Lichtenberg wrote in a Europe where “reason” was becoming a public religion, but institutions moved slowly and tradition still claimed moral authority. His sentence is a small Enlightenment instrument: it punctures complacency while staying honest about uncertainty. No prophecy, no grand theory of history, just a stern reminder about causality. If you want a different result, you don’t get to keep the same inputs.
It’s a quote that flatters neither revolutionaries nor reactionaries. It flatters only responsibility: the willingness to act without the luxury of certainty.
Then he pivots with a deliberately asymmetrical claim: while improvement isn’t ensured by change, it is impossible without it. The rhetoric is cleanly scientific, almost experimental. Change is not the outcome; it’s the necessary condition. That structure matters. It allows him to be anti-utopian without being conservative, to reject naive optimism without granting veto power to inertia. In that tension sits the subtext: people often demand proof that change will work before they’ll risk it, but the demand itself is a stalling tactic when the status quo is already failing.
Context sharpens the point. Lichtenberg wrote in a Europe where “reason” was becoming a public religion, but institutions moved slowly and tradition still claimed moral authority. His sentence is a small Enlightenment instrument: it punctures complacency while staying honest about uncertainty. No prophecy, no grand theory of history, just a stern reminder about causality. If you want a different result, you don’t get to keep the same inputs.
It’s a quote that flatters neither revolutionaries nor reactionaries. It flatters only responsibility: the willingness to act without the luxury of certainty.
Quote Details
| Topic | Embrace Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Georg
Add to List





