"I can't let important policy decisions hinge on the fact that an election is coming up every 90 days"
About this Quote
A leader complaining about elections every 90 days is really complaining about democracy doing what it does best: interrupting long-term plans with short-term accountability. Gerhard Schroder frames constant campaigning as a structural defect, not a personal inconvenience. The line is designed to sound responsible, almost managerial: policy is “important,” therefore it should be insulated from the noise of perpetual voting cycles. The choice of “hinge” is telling. It suggests policy is a door that should swing smoothly on its own engineering, not on the rhythm of public moods.
The subtext is a bid for governing room in a system where coalition politics, federal-state contests, and party leadership challenges can compress the timeline of political consequence. Schroder’s Germany in the late 1990s and early 2000s was wrestling with labor-market reform, welfare restructuring, and the costs of reunification and globalization. These are policies that impose pain up front and promise payoff later; the electoral calendar punishes that asymmetry. So the quote doubles as preemptive self-defense: if reforms stall or get watered down, blame the churn of electoral incentives rather than the design or politics of the reforms themselves.
There’s also a subtle assertion of technocratic legitimacy. “Important policy decisions” implies a class of choices too serious for constant popular arbitration. That can read as pragmatism or as impatience with voter sovereignty, depending on your tolerance for leaders who want the mandate without the meter running.
The subtext is a bid for governing room in a system where coalition politics, federal-state contests, and party leadership challenges can compress the timeline of political consequence. Schroder’s Germany in the late 1990s and early 2000s was wrestling with labor-market reform, welfare restructuring, and the costs of reunification and globalization. These are policies that impose pain up front and promise payoff later; the electoral calendar punishes that asymmetry. So the quote doubles as preemptive self-defense: if reforms stall or get watered down, blame the churn of electoral incentives rather than the design or politics of the reforms themselves.
There’s also a subtle assertion of technocratic legitimacy. “Important policy decisions” implies a class of choices too serious for constant popular arbitration. That can read as pragmatism or as impatience with voter sovereignty, depending on your tolerance for leaders who want the mandate without the meter running.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Gerhard
Add to List


