"I could never accept findings based almost exclusively on mathematics. It ain't ignorance that causes all the trouble in this world. It's the things people know that ain't so"
About this Quote
Armstrong’s line reads like a lab-bench manifesto from a man who watched “certainty” get weaponized. The inventor who helped build modern radio isn’t dunking on math as such; he’s pushing back against a particular kind of institutional confidence: conclusions sealed inside equations, insulated from messy signals, real-world interference, and the humiliating fact that devices have to work outside the chalkboard.
“I could never accept findings based almost exclusively on mathematics” is a protest against armchair authority. In engineering, math is a tool, not a verdict. Armstrong’s subtext is pragmatic and bruised: if you’ve spent years chasing noise out of a transmission, you learn that elegant models can still fail when reality introduces friction, bias, and unforeseen variables. He’s defending empiricism, but also defending the experimenter’s dignity against gatekeepers who can cite proofs while dismissing prototypes.
The second sentence is the sharper blade. “It ain’t ignorance...” flips the usual moral hierarchy. Armstrong targets false knowledge: beliefs granted social immunity because they’re conventional, credentialed, or convenient. That’s how industries calcify, how patent fights turn into theology, how bad assumptions survive because everyone has agreed not to notice their cracks. Coming from a figure entangled in corporate warfare over radio technology, it also hints at a darker ecology: people don’t just misunderstand; they cling to misunderstandings when money and status depend on them.
The quote works because it’s colloquial but surgical. The “ain’t so” isn’t folksy decoration; it’s a warning that the most dangerous errors arrive wearing a lab coat.
“I could never accept findings based almost exclusively on mathematics” is a protest against armchair authority. In engineering, math is a tool, not a verdict. Armstrong’s subtext is pragmatic and bruised: if you’ve spent years chasing noise out of a transmission, you learn that elegant models can still fail when reality introduces friction, bias, and unforeseen variables. He’s defending empiricism, but also defending the experimenter’s dignity against gatekeepers who can cite proofs while dismissing prototypes.
The second sentence is the sharper blade. “It ain’t ignorance...” flips the usual moral hierarchy. Armstrong targets false knowledge: beliefs granted social immunity because they’re conventional, credentialed, or convenient. That’s how industries calcify, how patent fights turn into theology, how bad assumptions survive because everyone has agreed not to notice their cracks. Coming from a figure entangled in corporate warfare over radio technology, it also hints at a darker ecology: people don’t just misunderstand; they cling to misunderstandings when money and status depend on them.
The quote works because it’s colloquial but surgical. The “ain’t so” isn’t folksy decoration; it’s a warning that the most dangerous errors arrive wearing a lab coat.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Edwin
Add to List




