"I did not do anything wrong as a governor, even if you accept the verdict as it is, it doesn't indicate that"
About this Quote
Edwin Edwards is doing the oldest trick in the political playbook: accepting the form of accountability while gutting its meaning. The line is built like a legal brief disguised as plain talk. “I did not do anything wrong” is the blunt, moral claim. Then he slips in the escape hatch: “even if you accept the verdict as it is.” That phrase pretends deference to institutions while inviting the listener to treat the verdict as a technicality, a misunderstanding, or at minimum an overreach. He’s not arguing innocence so much as redefining what the judgment can be allowed to prove.
The subtext is classic Edwards: I’m guilty on paper, not in reality; convicted in court, not convicted in the court of public opinion. The careful narrowing to “as a governor” matters, too. It suggests a split between the man and the office, between politics as practiced and politics as judged. He’s signaling that whatever happened happened in the murky zone of “how things work,” not in the bright line territory of ethical breach. That’s an appeal to a certain voter cynicism: you may not like it, but you recognize it.
Contextually, Edwards came up in a Louisiana political culture where charisma, patronage, and backroom dealing were often treated less as scandal than as ecosystem. The quote leverages that reality. It’s not a defense aimed at judges; it’s a bid to keep legitimacy with the people who already suspect the system is selective, performative, and late. By conceding the verdict’s existence while contesting its implication, Edwards tries to turn conviction into noise and keep his narrative intact.
The subtext is classic Edwards: I’m guilty on paper, not in reality; convicted in court, not convicted in the court of public opinion. The careful narrowing to “as a governor” matters, too. It suggests a split between the man and the office, between politics as practiced and politics as judged. He’s signaling that whatever happened happened in the murky zone of “how things work,” not in the bright line territory of ethical breach. That’s an appeal to a certain voter cynicism: you may not like it, but you recognize it.
Contextually, Edwards came up in a Louisiana political culture where charisma, patronage, and backroom dealing were often treated less as scandal than as ecosystem. The quote leverages that reality. It’s not a defense aimed at judges; it’s a bid to keep legitimacy with the people who already suspect the system is selective, performative, and late. By conceding the verdict’s existence while contesting its implication, Edwards tries to turn conviction into noise and keep his narrative intact.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Edwin
Add to List


