"I did not have three thousand pairs of shoes, I had one thousand and sixty"
About this Quote
The intent is image management, but the subtext is power: only someone insulated from ordinary consequence can imagine that “only” 1,060 pairs lands as exoneration. Shoes aren’t incidental here. In a country where many struggled for basics, luxury becomes a political language - a wearable proof that the ruling class lived in a different climate system of reality. Marcos’s insistence on the smaller figure doesn’t humble her; it asserts control over the narrative, the way authoritarians often do: concede a detail to avoid conceding the charge.
Context does the heavy lifting. After the Marcos regime fell and the palace inventories became global spectacle, the shoes turned into shorthand for plunder - a meme before memes. Her rebuttal is less about convincing skeptics than signaling to loyalists that she won’t accept the premise of shame. It’s a masterclass in reframing: not “I took too much,” but “you’re exaggerating,” as if accuracy could launder greed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Marcos, Imelda. (2026, January 17). I did not have three thousand pairs of shoes, I had one thousand and sixty. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-did-not-have-three-thousand-pairs-of-shoes-i-56192/
Chicago Style
Marcos, Imelda. "I did not have three thousand pairs of shoes, I had one thousand and sixty." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-did-not-have-three-thousand-pairs-of-shoes-i-56192/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I did not have three thousand pairs of shoes, I had one thousand and sixty." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-did-not-have-three-thousand-pairs-of-shoes-i-56192/. Accessed 28 Feb. 2026.










