"I didn't realize that television has gone through immense changes and has become very progressive"
About this Quote
There’s a quiet self-incrimination baked into Sutherland’s line: “I didn’t realize” reads like a confession from someone who’s benefited from television’s old power structures, then looked up to find the room rearranged. Coming from an actor whose career spans broadcast-era gatekeeping, prestige-cable reinvention, and now streaming’s algorithmic sprawl, the remark lands as both compliment and catch-up. TV didn’t simply “change”; it forced its own incumbents to change with it.
The word “progressive” does a lot of diplomatic work. It’s vague enough to signal social progress (more varied stories, less monochrome casting, more women and queer creators with real authority) without naming any flashpoints. It’s also an industry term now, shorthand for the shift from episodic, advertiser-safe formulas to riskier narratives and characters who aren’t engineered to be universally “likable.” In that sense, Sutherland is praising a medium that has learned to metabolize controversy as content.
The subtext is about legitimacy. For decades, film carried the cultural crown while TV was treated as a second-tier factory. The last 20 years flipped that hierarchy: series became the place where character complexity, political ambiguity, and formal experimentation could actually live long enough to matter. Sutherland’s surprise signals how thoroughly that revolution happened in real time, while many of its early beneficiaries were busy working, not theorizing.
It’s also an unintentionally revealing reminder: progress can be visible, even “immense,” and still be easy to miss if you’re not the one fighting for it.
The word “progressive” does a lot of diplomatic work. It’s vague enough to signal social progress (more varied stories, less monochrome casting, more women and queer creators with real authority) without naming any flashpoints. It’s also an industry term now, shorthand for the shift from episodic, advertiser-safe formulas to riskier narratives and characters who aren’t engineered to be universally “likable.” In that sense, Sutherland is praising a medium that has learned to metabolize controversy as content.
The subtext is about legitimacy. For decades, film carried the cultural crown while TV was treated as a second-tier factory. The last 20 years flipped that hierarchy: series became the place where character complexity, political ambiguity, and formal experimentation could actually live long enough to matter. Sutherland’s surprise signals how thoroughly that revolution happened in real time, while many of its early beneficiaries were busy working, not theorizing.
It’s also an unintentionally revealing reminder: progress can be visible, even “immense,” and still be easy to miss if you’re not the one fighting for it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Kiefer
Add to List



