"I didn't want to save art - I respected the older artists too much to think art needed saving. But I knew it was finished, even though, at that time, I didn't know what I would do"
About this Quote
LeWitt isn’t striking a heroic pose here; he’s dodging one. “Save art” is the kind of grandiose mission statement artists are supposed to perform for the public, but he swats it away as both arrogant and ahistorical. If you “respect” older artists, you don’t treat their work like a patient on life support. You treat it as a completed proposition.
Then comes the sharper, more destabilizing claim: art was “finished.” Not dead, not irrelevant, but finished in the sense that its existing rules had run their course. In the mid-1960s, that feeling was everywhere: Abstract Expressionism had calcified into style; Pop had already metabolized mass culture; Minimalism was stripping sculpture down to industrial fact. LeWitt’s line catches the moment when the romantic story of the artist-as-genius stopped being credible, yet no replacement myth had fully arrived.
The subtext is methodological, not melancholic. LeWitt is describing the precondition for Conceptual art: when form no longer promises discovery, the idea becomes the engine. “I didn’t know what I would do” reads less like confusion than like a deliberate clearing of the stage. He’s refusing the comforting script of continuity (art evolves, art progresses) and admitting the more honest reality: real breaks feel like free fall.
That tension is exactly why the quote works. It’s modest on the surface, radical underneath: not a call to rescue art, but permission to stop worshipping its inherited shapes and start building a new logic from scratch.
Then comes the sharper, more destabilizing claim: art was “finished.” Not dead, not irrelevant, but finished in the sense that its existing rules had run their course. In the mid-1960s, that feeling was everywhere: Abstract Expressionism had calcified into style; Pop had already metabolized mass culture; Minimalism was stripping sculpture down to industrial fact. LeWitt’s line catches the moment when the romantic story of the artist-as-genius stopped being credible, yet no replacement myth had fully arrived.
The subtext is methodological, not melancholic. LeWitt is describing the precondition for Conceptual art: when form no longer promises discovery, the idea becomes the engine. “I didn’t know what I would do” reads less like confusion than like a deliberate clearing of the stage. He’s refusing the comforting script of continuity (art evolves, art progresses) and admitting the more honest reality: real breaks feel like free fall.
That tension is exactly why the quote works. It’s modest on the surface, radical underneath: not a call to rescue art, but permission to stop worshipping its inherited shapes and start building a new logic from scratch.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Sol
Add to List











