"I do all the evil I can before I learn to shun it? Is it not enough to know the evil to shun it? If not, we should be sincere enough to admit that we love evil too well to give it up"
About this Quote
Gandhi laces a moral indictment into a pair of questions that refuse to let the listener hide behind ignorance. The first line mocks the familiar alibi: I had to taste the poison to know it was poison. By framing it as “I do all the evil I can,” he exposes how experimental sin is often just indulgence with a research grant. The rhetorical move is classic Gandhi: gentle on the surface, crushing in implication. If knowledge of harm doesn’t change behavior, then education isn’t the bottleneck. Desire is.
The subtext is especially pointed in a political leader who built a movement on disciplined self-restraint. Nonviolence, in Gandhi’s hands, isn’t a mere tactic; it’s an argument about human agency. You don’t get to outsource your ethics to immaturity, social pressure, or “learning experiences.” He’s pushing his audience toward an uncomfortable sincerity: if we keep repeating patterns we already recognize as wrong, it’s not confusion. It’s attachment.
Context matters here. Gandhi was speaking into a culture of empire and resistance where “necessary evils” were constantly being rationalized: violence in the name of liberation, exploitation in the name of progress, personal vice in the name of stress. His challenge isn’t puritanical; it’s strategic. Movements collapse when their members can’t admit what tempts them. The line lands because it makes moral failure sound less like tragedy and more like bad faith, forcing a choice: reform, or at least honest confession that we don’t actually want to.
The subtext is especially pointed in a political leader who built a movement on disciplined self-restraint. Nonviolence, in Gandhi’s hands, isn’t a mere tactic; it’s an argument about human agency. You don’t get to outsource your ethics to immaturity, social pressure, or “learning experiences.” He’s pushing his audience toward an uncomfortable sincerity: if we keep repeating patterns we already recognize as wrong, it’s not confusion. It’s attachment.
Context matters here. Gandhi was speaking into a culture of empire and resistance where “necessary evils” were constantly being rationalized: violence in the name of liberation, exploitation in the name of progress, personal vice in the name of stress. His challenge isn’t puritanical; it’s strategic. Movements collapse when their members can’t admit what tempts them. The line lands because it makes moral failure sound less like tragedy and more like bad faith, forcing a choice: reform, or at least honest confession that we don’t actually want to.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Mahatma
Add to List







