"I do like things that are not necessarily a reflection of what is considered the right thing by this culture. Somehow, promoting that status quo I find uninteresting"
About this Quote
Glover voices a principled preference for art and behavior that refuse easy alignment with whatever a culture labels the right thing. The phrase signals skepticism toward moral and aesthetic consensus, which often functions less as truth than as social lubricant. When the dominant story defines what is acceptable, repeating it may bring approval and profit, but it rarely yields surprise or insight. He is drawn instead to work that sits askew to prevailing expectations, because dissonance can expose assumptions that comfort tends to conceal.
The stance fits a career shaped by eccentric roles and self-directed, experimental projects. In an industry inclined to sand down edges, he has consistently leaned into the unusual, the unsettling, and the absurd. That choice is not merely contrarian. It is an argument about the purpose of art: to estrange the familiar, to test taboos, and to challenge the narratives that tell us who we are. By refusing to promote the status quo, he refuses to act as a marketing arm for consensus values. The result is a body of work that courts risk and misunderstanding, but also reserves space for genuine discovery.
Underlying his words is the recognition that the right thing is culturally contingent. Norms shift; what seems self-evident in one era becomes suspect in the next. If an artist confines himself to mirroring that flux, he becomes a stylist of fashion. Glover proposes a different ethic: cultivate the weird angle, the uncomfortable question, the unapproved form. Even when such work fails or offends, it can clarify where the boundaries are and why they are there. That clarifying friction is what he finds interesting, because it keeps both art and audience alive to the possibility that consensus can be lazy, that virtue can be performative, and that meaning often lies just outside the safety of agreement.
The stance fits a career shaped by eccentric roles and self-directed, experimental projects. In an industry inclined to sand down edges, he has consistently leaned into the unusual, the unsettling, and the absurd. That choice is not merely contrarian. It is an argument about the purpose of art: to estrange the familiar, to test taboos, and to challenge the narratives that tell us who we are. By refusing to promote the status quo, he refuses to act as a marketing arm for consensus values. The result is a body of work that courts risk and misunderstanding, but also reserves space for genuine discovery.
Underlying his words is the recognition that the right thing is culturally contingent. Norms shift; what seems self-evident in one era becomes suspect in the next. If an artist confines himself to mirroring that flux, he becomes a stylist of fashion. Glover proposes a different ethic: cultivate the weird angle, the uncomfortable question, the unapproved form. Even when such work fails or offends, it can clarify where the boundaries are and why they are there. That clarifying friction is what he finds interesting, because it keeps both art and audience alive to the possibility that consensus can be lazy, that virtue can be performative, and that meaning often lies just outside the safety of agreement.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Crispin
Add to List

