"I do not have, nor do I believe I have seen, a vision capacious and convincing enough to propound as an organizing principle for the next phase in the law of our Constitution"
About this Quote
Tribe is doing something rarer in American constitutional talk than a grand theory: he’s refusing the dopamine hit of a “new paradigm.” In a legal culture that rewards sweeping frameworks - originalism, living constitutionalism, common-good constitutionalism - this line is a deliberate act of restraint. The phrasing is lawyerly, but the move is political: he’s signaling that the Constitution’s “next phase” can’t be responsibly managed by a single, marketable organizing principle.
The intent is both modest and tactical. “I do not have” is personal humility, but “nor do I believe I have seen” widens the indictment to the entire ecosystem of judges, professors, and pundits selling master keys. “Capacious and convincing” is a high bar that quietly mocks the way theories often win by being catchy rather than comprehensive. He’s telling you that if a vision claims to organize everything, it’s probably omitting the messy parts - precedent, institutional limits, democratic legitimacy, and the uneven facts of modern life.
Context matters: Tribe’s career spans the Warren Court’s rights-expansion era, the conservative legal movement’s intellectual consolidation, and today’s Supreme Court that often feels less like an umpire and more like an engine of ideological renovation. Against that backdrop, the quote reads as a warning: constitutional law is entering a period where “organizing principles” can become permission structures for power.
The subtext is a plea for epistemic humility in a field addicted to certainty. Tribe isn’t offering a new map; he’s questioning the urge to pretend the terrain is simple enough for one.
The intent is both modest and tactical. “I do not have” is personal humility, but “nor do I believe I have seen” widens the indictment to the entire ecosystem of judges, professors, and pundits selling master keys. “Capacious and convincing” is a high bar that quietly mocks the way theories often win by being catchy rather than comprehensive. He’s telling you that if a vision claims to organize everything, it’s probably omitting the messy parts - precedent, institutional limits, democratic legitimacy, and the uneven facts of modern life.
Context matters: Tribe’s career spans the Warren Court’s rights-expansion era, the conservative legal movement’s intellectual consolidation, and today’s Supreme Court that often feels less like an umpire and more like an engine of ideological renovation. Against that backdrop, the quote reads as a warning: constitutional law is entering a period where “organizing principles” can become permission structures for power.
The subtext is a plea for epistemic humility in a field addicted to certainty. Tribe isn’t offering a new map; he’s questioning the urge to pretend the terrain is simple enough for one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Laurence
Add to List


