"I do not like violence"
About this Quote
"I do not like violence" lands with the bluntness of a moral refusal, but its power comes from how much it declines to perform. Abdurrahman Wahid wasnt a politician selling toughness; he was a Muslim scholar-turned-president of Indonesia, steering a sprawling, fragile democracy just after the fall of Suharto. In that context, a simple aversion reads like strategy: de-escalation as governance, restraint as legitimacy.
The phrasing matters. Not "violence is wrong" (a sermon), not "we will defeat violence" (a campaign slogan), but "I do not like" - personal, almost disarmingly plain. It lowers the temperature. It signals that the speaker wont let brutality become a language everyone is forced to speak, even when the state has the means to do so. The subtext is a rebuke to two temptations at once: the authoritarian habit of treating force as efficiency, and the insurgent fantasy that righteousness is proven by blood.
Wahid governed amid communal conflicts, separatist pressures, and a security apparatus trained for repression. His reputation for pluralism and civil liberties made him a target for hardliners who wanted coercion framed as necessity. So this sentence also functions as a litmus test: if you find it naive, youre already halfway to excusing the next crackdown. If you find it steadying, youre hearing a democratic ethic trying to survive its most predictable stress test.
The phrasing matters. Not "violence is wrong" (a sermon), not "we will defeat violence" (a campaign slogan), but "I do not like" - personal, almost disarmingly plain. It lowers the temperature. It signals that the speaker wont let brutality become a language everyone is forced to speak, even when the state has the means to do so. The subtext is a rebuke to two temptations at once: the authoritarian habit of treating force as efficiency, and the insurgent fantasy that righteousness is proven by blood.
Wahid governed amid communal conflicts, separatist pressures, and a security apparatus trained for repression. His reputation for pluralism and civil liberties made him a target for hardliners who wanted coercion framed as necessity. So this sentence also functions as a litmus test: if you find it naive, youre already halfway to excusing the next crackdown. If you find it steadying, youre hearing a democratic ethic trying to survive its most predictable stress test.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Abdurrahman
Add to List





