"I do not think we should be trying to save our freedom by killing the safeguards that keep our liberties"
About this Quote
The intent is less philosophical than procedural. Engel is defending the boring machinery of liberal democracy - courts, congressional checks, civil liberties rules - precisely because those are the first things politicians ask the public to “temporarily” suspend. The subtext is pointed: if you’re asking to weaken these constraints, you’re not protecting freedom; you’re protecting discretion. And discretion, in politics, is rarely surrendered voluntarily.
Contextually, this fits the post-9/11 and post-PATRIOT Act era as much as any later moment of “exceptional” politics: terrorism, war, mass protest, pandemics, border crises. Each comes with a familiar script: fear, speed, secrecy. Engel’s sentence is engineered to puncture that script. It frames liberties not as vibes but as systems, and systems don’t survive being treated as expendable. The real punch is moral: a state that must unmake its own restraints to feel safe is admitting it doesn’t trust itself with power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Engel, Eliot. (2026, January 17). I do not think we should be trying to save our freedom by killing the safeguards that keep our liberties. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-do-not-think-we-should-be-trying-to-save-our-59046/
Chicago Style
Engel, Eliot. "I do not think we should be trying to save our freedom by killing the safeguards that keep our liberties." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-do-not-think-we-should-be-trying-to-save-our-59046/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I do not think we should be trying to save our freedom by killing the safeguards that keep our liberties." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-do-not-think-we-should-be-trying-to-save-our-59046/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.









