"I do not think we should be trying to save our freedom by killing the safeguards that keep our liberties"
About this Quote
There is a particular kind of political sleight of hand that sells itself as toughness while quietly sawing through the guardrails. Eliot Engel’s line refuses that bargain. The phrasing is doing double duty: it sounds like common sense, but it’s also a warning about how democracies corrode from the inside, not just through outside threats. “Save our freedom” is the rallying cry every administration uses in a crisis; Engel flips it into an accusation by making the method the villain. You can hear the target in “killing the safeguards”: emergency powers, shortcuts around due process, surveillance expansions, the impulse to treat oversight as an obstacle instead of a feature.
The intent is less philosophical than procedural. Engel is defending the boring machinery of liberal democracy - courts, congressional checks, civil liberties rules - precisely because those are the first things politicians ask the public to “temporarily” suspend. The subtext is pointed: if you’re asking to weaken these constraints, you’re not protecting freedom; you’re protecting discretion. And discretion, in politics, is rarely surrendered voluntarily.
Contextually, this fits the post-9/11 and post-PATRIOT Act era as much as any later moment of “exceptional” politics: terrorism, war, mass protest, pandemics, border crises. Each comes with a familiar script: fear, speed, secrecy. Engel’s sentence is engineered to puncture that script. It frames liberties not as vibes but as systems, and systems don’t survive being treated as expendable. The real punch is moral: a state that must unmake its own restraints to feel safe is admitting it doesn’t trust itself with power.
The intent is less philosophical than procedural. Engel is defending the boring machinery of liberal democracy - courts, congressional checks, civil liberties rules - precisely because those are the first things politicians ask the public to “temporarily” suspend. The subtext is pointed: if you’re asking to weaken these constraints, you’re not protecting freedom; you’re protecting discretion. And discretion, in politics, is rarely surrendered voluntarily.
Contextually, this fits the post-9/11 and post-PATRIOT Act era as much as any later moment of “exceptional” politics: terrorism, war, mass protest, pandemics, border crises. Each comes with a familiar script: fear, speed, secrecy. Engel’s sentence is engineered to puncture that script. It frames liberties not as vibes but as systems, and systems don’t survive being treated as expendable. The real punch is moral: a state that must unmake its own restraints to feel safe is admitting it doesn’t trust itself with power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Eliot
Add to List






