"I don t think cartoons are only for kids, but I think kids will love anything as long as it's visually interesting"
About this Quote
Then he pivots: kids will love anything “as long as it’s visually interesting.” That’s the dagger. It reframes children not as simpletons who need moral lessons, but as ruthless formalists. Kids, in his view, respond to rhythm, color, exaggeration, surprise - the raw grammar of looking. Story and “appropriateness” become secondary to the immediate hit of design and motion. There’s also a critique of the industry’s lazy segmentation: if your work only “works for kids,” maybe you’ve confused pandering with clarity.
The subtext is an artist defending pleasure and craft over respectability. Animation, he implies, doesn’t need to earn legitimacy by pretending to be something else. It wins by being irresistibly seen.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Kricfalusi, John. (n.d.). I don t think cartoons are only for kids, but I think kids will love anything as long as it's visually interesting. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-don-t-think-cartoons-are-only-for-kids-but-i-106957/
Chicago Style
Kricfalusi, John. "I don t think cartoons are only for kids, but I think kids will love anything as long as it's visually interesting." FixQuotes. Accessed February 3, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-don-t-think-cartoons-are-only-for-kids-but-i-106957/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I don t think cartoons are only for kids, but I think kids will love anything as long as it's visually interesting." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-don-t-think-cartoons-are-only-for-kids-but-i-106957/. Accessed 3 Feb. 2026.


