"I don't analyze what I'm doing. I've read convincing interpretations of my work, and sometimes I've noticed something that I wasn't aware of, but I think, at this point, people read into my work out of habit. Or I'm just very, very smart"
About this Quote
Sherman slips the knife in with a shrug. The line performs the exact move her photographs have always pulled off: it invites interpretation, then exposes how quickly we reach for it. By claiming she doesn't analyze her own work, she refuses the comforting myth that the artist is the final authority on meaning. Yet she doesn't quite cede the floor to critics either. "I've read convincing interpretations" is a polite concession with a trapdoor underneath it: critics can be right, but not because she planted a tidy thesis. Sometimes they simply notice what culture has already taught them to look for.
The subtext is a critique of art-world reflexes, especially around a body of work that has been canonized as feminist theory in images. Sherman knows her pictures of constructed femininity, glamour, and horror have been used as proof texts for big ideas about the male gaze, mass media, and identity. Her point isn't that those readings are wrong; it's that interpretation can become muscle memory. When a work is famous for being "about" something, the audience starts performing expertise the way you perform taste: by decoding.
Then comes the punchline: "Or I'm just very, very smart". It's self-mockery and self-defense at once. She satirizes the demand that artists be both intuitive and academically legible, while also reclaiming a kind of authorship: maybe the depth is there, even if it wasn't diagrammed in advance. Sherman weaponizes ambiguity as method and as commentary on the industry that profits from turning ambiguity into certainty.
The subtext is a critique of art-world reflexes, especially around a body of work that has been canonized as feminist theory in images. Sherman knows her pictures of constructed femininity, glamour, and horror have been used as proof texts for big ideas about the male gaze, mass media, and identity. Her point isn't that those readings are wrong; it's that interpretation can become muscle memory. When a work is famous for being "about" something, the audience starts performing expertise the way you perform taste: by decoding.
Then comes the punchline: "Or I'm just very, very smart". It's self-mockery and self-defense at once. She satirizes the demand that artists be both intuitive and academically legible, while also reclaiming a kind of authorship: maybe the depth is there, even if it wasn't diagrammed in advance. Sherman weaponizes ambiguity as method and as commentary on the industry that profits from turning ambiguity into certainty.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Cindy
Add to List


