"I don't begin a novel or a screenplay until I know the ending. And I don't mean only that I have to know what happens. I mean that I have to hear the actual sentences. I have to know what atmosphere the words convey"
About this Quote
Irving’s method isn’t the tidy-minded “outline first” advice you get in craft books; it’s a declaration that story is sound before it’s plot. He starts at the finish because the ending isn’t just a destination, it’s the lens that colors every earlier scene. In Irving’s world, you don’t earn meaning at the last minute. You plant it. Knowing the ending means knowing what kind of grief, relief, irony, or moral aftertaste the reader should carry out of the book.
The telling move is his refusal to separate “what happens” from “the actual sentences.” That’s a novelist’s quiet flex and a warning: narrative architecture is inseparable from diction. Irving’s endings are often engineered to feel inevitable, but “inevitable” is a linguistic trick as much as a structural one. The “atmosphere the words convey” points to cadence, temperature, and pressure - the way a final paragraph can retroactively reorganize everything that came before it. He’s describing an ending as a tuning fork. Strike it, and the whole book has to vibrate in sympathy.
Subtextually, this is an argument against the myth of inspiration as discovery. Irving is staking out control: the writer as designer, not diarist. Context matters here: coming out of a tradition of big, eventful, causally tight novels, he’s aligning himself with the 19th-century confidence that narrative is built, not stumbled upon. The ending, for him, is where the book’s voice proves it knew what it was doing all along.
The telling move is his refusal to separate “what happens” from “the actual sentences.” That’s a novelist’s quiet flex and a warning: narrative architecture is inseparable from diction. Irving’s endings are often engineered to feel inevitable, but “inevitable” is a linguistic trick as much as a structural one. The “atmosphere the words convey” points to cadence, temperature, and pressure - the way a final paragraph can retroactively reorganize everything that came before it. He’s describing an ending as a tuning fork. Strike it, and the whole book has to vibrate in sympathy.
Subtextually, this is an argument against the myth of inspiration as discovery. Irving is staking out control: the writer as designer, not diarist. Context matters here: coming out of a tradition of big, eventful, causally tight novels, he’s aligning himself with the 19th-century confidence that narrative is built, not stumbled upon. The ending, for him, is where the book’s voice proves it knew what it was doing all along.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
