"I don't doubt the sincerity of my Democratic friends. And they should not doubt ours"
About this Quote
McCain’s line is a pressure-release valve masquerading as a compliment. By opening with “I don’t doubt the sincerity,” he grants Democrats the one thing Washington is always bargaining for: moral legitimacy. But he grants it in a tightly fenced way. “Sincerity” is about motives, not outcomes. It concedes good faith while leaving every policy fight intact, a rhetorical move that sounds generous and costs almost nothing.
The second sentence does the real work. “And they should not doubt ours” flips the posture from magnanimity to demand. It’s reciprocity framed as etiquette: I’m being civil, you owe me civility. In the subtext is a rebuke of the most corrosive habit in modern politics, the default assumption that the other side is not just wrong but malicious. McCain is trying to police the boundaries of disagreement: argue hard, don’t indict character. The “should” is doing heavy lifting, signaling that Democrats have been crossing that line, or at least that McCain wants the audience to feel they have.
Context matters because McCain’s brand was always tethered to a certain kind of institutional patriotism - an insistence that conflict is legitimate only if it remains within shared democratic rules. This is the language of the Senate as a club with norms, not a permanent campaign. It also functions as self-positioning: McCain casts himself as the adult in the room, inviting the public to see him as principled rather than partisan, even while he fights as a partisan. The brilliance is that it sounds like bridge-building and still sharpens the battlefield into “our” side and “their” side - just with better manners.
The second sentence does the real work. “And they should not doubt ours” flips the posture from magnanimity to demand. It’s reciprocity framed as etiquette: I’m being civil, you owe me civility. In the subtext is a rebuke of the most corrosive habit in modern politics, the default assumption that the other side is not just wrong but malicious. McCain is trying to police the boundaries of disagreement: argue hard, don’t indict character. The “should” is doing heavy lifting, signaling that Democrats have been crossing that line, or at least that McCain wants the audience to feel they have.
Context matters because McCain’s brand was always tethered to a certain kind of institutional patriotism - an insistence that conflict is legitimate only if it remains within shared democratic rules. This is the language of the Senate as a club with norms, not a permanent campaign. It also functions as self-positioning: McCain casts himself as the adult in the room, inviting the public to see him as principled rather than partisan, even while he fights as a partisan. The brilliance is that it sounds like bridge-building and still sharpens the battlefield into “our” side and “their” side - just with better manners.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List








