"I don't know where the stock market is going, but I will say this, that if it continues higher, this will do more to stimulate the economy than anything we've been talking about today or anything anybody else was talking about"
About this Quote
For a man celebrated (and blamed) for moving markets with a raised eyebrow, Greenspan’s shrug is doing a lot of work. “I don’t know where the stock market is going” is a ritual disclaimer: the technocrat’s version of washing your hands before touching the levers. It signals humility and inoculates him against the charge that he’s jawboning prices upward. Then comes the pivot: if stocks keep rising, it will outmuscle “anything we’ve been talking about.” That’s not uncertainty; it’s a quiet hierarchy of power.
The intent is to reframe economic stimulus away from fiscal packages, policy programs, and congressional horse-trading, toward the wealth effect and confidence channel. Greenspan is effectively saying: you can debate multipliers all day, but nothing juice-ups consumption like people opening their brokerage statements and feeling richer. Subtext: in an economy increasingly geared toward asset appreciation, markets aren’t just a barometer of growth - they’re a generator of it.
Context matters because it exposes the political convenience of the claim. Elevating the stock market as the ultimate stimulus flatters Wall Street’s centrality while giving policymakers cover: if equities can do the heavy lifting, elected officials can avoid messier choices about wages, public investment, or inequality. The line also contains a warning disguised as optimism. If the economy is leaning this hard on rising asset prices, it’s vulnerable to reversals - and the “stimulus” can turn into a shock overnight. Greenspan’s trademark: a half-denial that still manages to consecrate the market as the main character.
The intent is to reframe economic stimulus away from fiscal packages, policy programs, and congressional horse-trading, toward the wealth effect and confidence channel. Greenspan is effectively saying: you can debate multipliers all day, but nothing juice-ups consumption like people opening their brokerage statements and feeling richer. Subtext: in an economy increasingly geared toward asset appreciation, markets aren’t just a barometer of growth - they’re a generator of it.
Context matters because it exposes the political convenience of the claim. Elevating the stock market as the ultimate stimulus flatters Wall Street’s centrality while giving policymakers cover: if equities can do the heavy lifting, elected officials can avoid messier choices about wages, public investment, or inequality. The line also contains a warning disguised as optimism. If the economy is leaning this hard on rising asset prices, it’s vulnerable to reversals - and the “stimulus” can turn into a shock overnight. Greenspan’s trademark: a half-denial that still manages to consecrate the market as the main character.
Quote Details
| Topic | Investment |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alan
Add to List
