"I don't know who's 18 years old today that, 20 years hence, is going to be a jazz fan"
About this Quote
Granz lands the line like a grim punchline: not about taste, but about time. On the surface he is fretting over demographics, the standard industry panic. Underneath, he is diagnosing a deeper problem jazz has always wrestled with: it ages in the public imagination faster than it ages on the bandstand. When a music gets filed as heritage, the audience stops being a pipeline and starts being a dwindling club.
Coming from Norman Granz, the anxiety has extra bite. This is the impresario who built Jazz at the Philharmonic, who put Dizzy, Bird, Ella, and Oscar Peterson on big stages, and who fought segregation with the blunt instrument of contract power. He knew jazz as a living, star-driven popular force because he helped make it one. So the question isnt nostalgic hand-wringing; its a business-savvy, culture-savvy warning from someone who understood that art forms survive when they keep recruiting teenagers.
The subtext is also an indictment of gatekeeping and institutionalization. Jazz can become a museum piece: taught, revered, subsidized, politely applauded. That kind of respectability is deadly if it replaces the messier thrill that made the music feel urgent in the first place. Granz is really asking who will give jazz the social function pop music gets by default: a soundtrack to identity, rebellion, romance, and belonging.
Its a prediction framed as a challenge. If jazz wants fans in twenty years, it cant only be preserved; it has to be needed.
Coming from Norman Granz, the anxiety has extra bite. This is the impresario who built Jazz at the Philharmonic, who put Dizzy, Bird, Ella, and Oscar Peterson on big stages, and who fought segregation with the blunt instrument of contract power. He knew jazz as a living, star-driven popular force because he helped make it one. So the question isnt nostalgic hand-wringing; its a business-savvy, culture-savvy warning from someone who understood that art forms survive when they keep recruiting teenagers.
The subtext is also an indictment of gatekeeping and institutionalization. Jazz can become a museum piece: taught, revered, subsidized, politely applauded. That kind of respectability is deadly if it replaces the messier thrill that made the music feel urgent in the first place. Granz is really asking who will give jazz the social function pop music gets by default: a soundtrack to identity, rebellion, romance, and belonging.
Its a prediction framed as a challenge. If jazz wants fans in twenty years, it cant only be preserved; it has to be needed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Norman
Add to List




