"I don't know why they're doing it. I have to assume that their motives are positive, not negative. But they don't understand the severity of the problem in this state"
About this Quote
Davis is performing a politician's tightrope act: he wants to sound fair-minded toward his opponents while quietly indicting them as reckless. The opening clause, "I don't know why they're doing it", plays like bafflement, but it's strategic bafflement. It frames the other side's actions as so irrational they resist explanation, letting him question their competence without making an accusation he can't prove.
Then comes the mandatory ethical posture: "I have to assume that their motives are positive, not negative". The phrase "have to" is the tell. It's less a statement of belief than a ritual disclaimer, the kind that signals, I'm going to criticize you, but I'm not going to say you're evil. It's also a preemptive shield against charges of partisanship: he's extending good faith in public precisely so he can withdraw it in policy terms.
The pivot lands on the real charge: "But they don't understand the severity of the problem in this state". Subtext: they are endangering Californians through ignorance, denial, or unserious politics. Davis isn't fighting over intentions; he's fighting over reality. "Severity" is doing heavy lifting here, invoking emergency, budget collapse, rolling blackouts-era anxiety, or whatever crisis moment is in play. "In this state" doubles as geography and governance, implying he possesses the full briefing that critics lack.
As rhetoric, it's calibrated for a televised scrum: mild on tone, sharp on implication. He casts himself as the adult in the room, trapped between civic generosity and an incoming disaster his rivals refuse to see.
Then comes the mandatory ethical posture: "I have to assume that their motives are positive, not negative". The phrase "have to" is the tell. It's less a statement of belief than a ritual disclaimer, the kind that signals, I'm going to criticize you, but I'm not going to say you're evil. It's also a preemptive shield against charges of partisanship: he's extending good faith in public precisely so he can withdraw it in policy terms.
The pivot lands on the real charge: "But they don't understand the severity of the problem in this state". Subtext: they are endangering Californians through ignorance, denial, or unserious politics. Davis isn't fighting over intentions; he's fighting over reality. "Severity" is doing heavy lifting here, invoking emergency, budget collapse, rolling blackouts-era anxiety, or whatever crisis moment is in play. "In this state" doubles as geography and governance, implying he possesses the full briefing that critics lack.
As rhetoric, it's calibrated for a televised scrum: mild on tone, sharp on implication. He casts himself as the adult in the room, trapped between civic generosity and an incoming disaster his rivals refuse to see.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Gray
Add to List
