"I don't like a lot of social programs either because it makes you non-productive"
About this Quote
Evers is doing something politically risky and rhetorically shrewd: borrowing the language of conservative self-reliance to argue about freedom from a different angle. “I don’t like a lot of social programs” lands like a concession to the small-government critique, but the real payload is the follow-up clause: “because it makes you non-productive.” He’s not moralizing poverty; he’s warning about dependency as a trap that can blunt individual agency and community momentum. Coming from an activist whose life was shaped by the fight for Black political power in Mississippi, the line reads less like beltway austerity and more like hard-earned suspicion of systems that keep people waiting.
The subtext is about dignity as much as economics. “Non-productive” isn’t just about labor output; it’s about political and psychological posture. If a program is designed or administered in a way that discourages initiative, Evers implies, it can quietly replace one form of control with another: the right to participate traded for the need to comply. That’s a particularly charged critique in the post-civil rights era, when federal help and local patronage could both arrive with strings, surveillance, or humiliating bureaucracy.
The intent, then, isn’t to erase the need for a safety net. It’s to demand that assistance be structured as a lever, not a hammock: tools that expand capacity, not arrangements that normalize stagnation. Evers frames productivity as civic power - a way to insist that liberation includes the ability to build, earn, and decide, not merely to receive.
The subtext is about dignity as much as economics. “Non-productive” isn’t just about labor output; it’s about political and psychological posture. If a program is designed or administered in a way that discourages initiative, Evers implies, it can quietly replace one form of control with another: the right to participate traded for the need to comply. That’s a particularly charged critique in the post-civil rights era, when federal help and local patronage could both arrive with strings, surveillance, or humiliating bureaucracy.
The intent, then, isn’t to erase the need for a safety net. It’s to demand that assistance be structured as a lever, not a hammock: tools that expand capacity, not arrangements that normalize stagnation. Evers frames productivity as civic power - a way to insist that liberation includes the ability to build, earn, and decide, not merely to receive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work Ethic |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List