"I don't like it, and I'm sorry I ever had anything to do with it"
About this Quote
Regret rarely sounds this blunt in science, a field that trains its practitioners to hide the messy human parts behind equations. Schroedinger’s line is striking because it refuses that mask. It reads like a private admission that slipped into public record: not a critique, not a caveat, but a full-bodied recoil. The power is in the pronouns. “I don’t like it” is taste language, almost aesthetic, as if quantum mechanics were a bad painting. “I’m sorry I ever had anything to do with it” goes further, turning scientific contribution into moral entanglement, the kind you want to wash off.
The context is the early quantum revolution, when physics stopped behaving like common sense and started behaving like probability. Schroedinger helped build the new framework with wave mechanics, yet he was famously uneasy with what the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation seemed to demand: indeterminacy as a fundamental feature, not a gap in knowledge. His discomfort wasn’t just technical; it was philosophical. If reality can’t be said to have definite properties until measured, the scientist becomes less a discoverer and more an accomplice to weirdness.
Subtextually, the quote is a protest against being drafted into a worldview. Schroedinger can’t simply “disagree” with quantum theory; he’s implicated in it. The line is also a quiet act of self-fashioning: distancing himself from the interpretation that would define the era, even as he helped make it possible. In an age that treats innovation as automatically virtuous, Schroedinger offers a rarer posture: the inventor who looks at his own breakthrough and flinches.
The context is the early quantum revolution, when physics stopped behaving like common sense and started behaving like probability. Schroedinger helped build the new framework with wave mechanics, yet he was famously uneasy with what the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation seemed to demand: indeterminacy as a fundamental feature, not a gap in knowledge. His discomfort wasn’t just technical; it was philosophical. If reality can’t be said to have definite properties until measured, the scientist becomes less a discoverer and more an accomplice to weirdness.
Subtextually, the quote is a protest against being drafted into a worldview. Schroedinger can’t simply “disagree” with quantum theory; he’s implicated in it. The line is also a quiet act of self-fashioning: distancing himself from the interpretation that would define the era, even as he helped make it possible. In an age that treats innovation as automatically virtuous, Schroedinger offers a rarer posture: the inventor who looks at his own breakthrough and flinches.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning from Mistakes |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Erwin
Add to List

