"I don't like to show my emotions at the board, not because they might give something away to an opponent, but because that's my style: I like to keep it to myself"
About this Quote
Control is Kramnik's signature, and this line makes that control feel less like gamesmanship and more like identity. He rejects the obvious chess rationale first: the poker-face as tactical concealment. That quick dismissal matters because it reframes the whole performance of elite chess. He isn't presenting emotional restraint as a trick; he's presenting it as a personal ethic. The subtext is almost defiant: even in a sport that rewards psychological leverage, he doesn't want his inner life conscripted into strategy.
The phrasing "at the board" does a lot of work. Chess is marketed as pure intellect, but anyone who's watched top-level play knows it's also endurance theater: time trouble, blunders, swagger, tilt. Kramnik draws a boundary around that theater. "That's my style" sounds casual, but it functions like a brand statement, the way an athlete might talk about being "locked in". He's not ashamed of emotion; he's protective of it. Keeping it "to myself" suggests privacy as strength, not repression.
Contextually, Kramnik came up in an era when the public was learning to read grandmasters as characters: Kasparov's volcanic intensity, Anand's calm, later Carlsen's visible frustration. Against that backdrop, Kramnik's restraint becomes a counter-narrative: mastery as interiority. The intent isn't to look invulnerable; it's to keep the game from colonizing the self. In a culture hungry for tells, he denies the audience as much as the opponent.
The phrasing "at the board" does a lot of work. Chess is marketed as pure intellect, but anyone who's watched top-level play knows it's also endurance theater: time trouble, blunders, swagger, tilt. Kramnik draws a boundary around that theater. "That's my style" sounds casual, but it functions like a brand statement, the way an athlete might talk about being "locked in". He's not ashamed of emotion; he's protective of it. Keeping it "to myself" suggests privacy as strength, not repression.
Contextually, Kramnik came up in an era when the public was learning to read grandmasters as characters: Kasparov's volcanic intensity, Anand's calm, later Carlsen's visible frustration. Against that backdrop, Kramnik's restraint becomes a counter-narrative: mastery as interiority. The intent isn't to look invulnerable; it's to keep the game from colonizing the self. In a culture hungry for tells, he denies the audience as much as the opponent.
Quote Details
| Topic | Self-Discipline |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Vladimir
Add to List






