"I don't mind losing, but I don't like losing to cheats"
About this Quote
There is a clean, almost disarming pragmatism in Pete Waterman’s line: it doesn’t dress itself up as sportsmanship, but it does insist on a baseline of fairness. “I don’t mind losing” is a calculated concession, the kind that signals maturity and self-knowledge. Loss, he implies, is part of any real contest - especially in a hit-driven industry where taste, timing, and luck can flatten talent overnight. Then comes the turn: “but I don’t like losing to cheats.” The point isn’t bruised ego; it’s a refusal to treat rigged outcomes as legitimate.
As a producer, Waterman’s world has always been a marketplace of metrics: chart positions, radio rotations, marketing budgets, gatekeepers. The subtext is a complaint about asymmetry masquerading as competition. “Cheats” can mean literal fraud, sure, but it can also gesture at payola, backroom deals, cynical branding, or the quiet manipulations that turn “popular” into “purchased.” He’s drawing a moral boundary around losing: defeat is acceptable when the rules are shared; it’s corrosive when the playing field is tilted by people who don’t even respect the game.
The sentence works because it’s not sentimental. It’s the blunt ethic of someone who’s spent decades watching talent get sorted by forces that pretend to be neutral. Waterman isn’t asking to win; he’s asking for outcomes you can believe in. In a culture that loves to frame success as pure merit, that’s the sharper accusation.
As a producer, Waterman’s world has always been a marketplace of metrics: chart positions, radio rotations, marketing budgets, gatekeepers. The subtext is a complaint about asymmetry masquerading as competition. “Cheats” can mean literal fraud, sure, but it can also gesture at payola, backroom deals, cynical branding, or the quiet manipulations that turn “popular” into “purchased.” He’s drawing a moral boundary around losing: defeat is acceptable when the rules are shared; it’s corrosive when the playing field is tilted by people who don’t even respect the game.
The sentence works because it’s not sentimental. It’s the blunt ethic of someone who’s spent decades watching talent get sorted by forces that pretend to be neutral. Waterman isn’t asking to win; he’s asking for outcomes you can believe in. In a culture that loves to frame success as pure merit, that’s the sharper accusation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Pete
Add to List






