"I don't particularly enjoy watching films in 3D because I think that a well-shot and well-projected film has a very three-dimensional quality to it, so I'm somewhat sceptical of the technology"
About this Quote
Nolan’s skepticism about 3D isn’t technophobia; it’s a defense of cinema as a craft where depth is earned, not bolted on. When he says a “well-shot and well-projected film” already feels three-dimensional, he’s staking out a philosophy: spatial immersion comes from composition, lighting, lens choice, blocking, and contrast, plus the unglamorous infrastructure of exhibition. The line quietly shifts the burden of “wow” away from consumer-facing gimmicks and back onto filmmakers and theaters. If the image is flat, he implies, the problem is rarely that it lacks glasses.
The subtext is also industrial. Nolan came up in an era when 3D was rebranded as a premium upsell - post-Avatar ticket surcharges, studio mandates, rushed conversions, darker projection. His phrase “somewhat sceptical” is polite, but it lands as a rebuke of a business model that treats visual spectacle as a plug-in feature rather than an aesthetic decision. For a director associated with IMAX, practical effects, and a near-religious commitment to the theatrical experience, 3D threatens to meddle with brightness, color fidelity, and the viewer’s relationship to the frame.
Context matters: Nolan’s films chase immersion through clarity and scale, not sensory clutter. He’s arguing that the real “3D” is a disciplined illusion, one that depends on taste, money spent on projection, and an audience allowed to look - not be poked - into attention.
The subtext is also industrial. Nolan came up in an era when 3D was rebranded as a premium upsell - post-Avatar ticket surcharges, studio mandates, rushed conversions, darker projection. His phrase “somewhat sceptical” is polite, but it lands as a rebuke of a business model that treats visual spectacle as a plug-in feature rather than an aesthetic decision. For a director associated with IMAX, practical effects, and a near-religious commitment to the theatrical experience, 3D threatens to meddle with brightness, color fidelity, and the viewer’s relationship to the frame.
Context matters: Nolan’s films chase immersion through clarity and scale, not sensory clutter. He’s arguing that the real “3D” is a disciplined illusion, one that depends on taste, money spent on projection, and an audience allowed to look - not be poked - into attention.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List



