"I don't think I know a Scientologist except when I see one or two of their actors on the Hollywood screen"
About this Quote
Falwell’s line isn’t really about Scientology; it’s about who gets to count as “real” America. He frames Scientologists as people you don’t meet in ordinary life, only as distant images beamed from Hollywood. That’s a rhetorical move with a long pedigree in culture-war talk: if a group is mostly encountered through media, it can be cast as elite, manufactured, and suspect. The punch of the sentence comes from its casual shrug - “I don’t think I know” - which pretends humility while quietly drawing a boundary between the normal world (his audience) and the glamorous, alien one (their actors).
The subtext is twofold. First, Scientology is reduced to celebrity PR, not a faith with congregants, practices, or community. Second, Hollywood becomes the delivery system for moral contamination: not a workplace, but a screen that projects values into homes. Falwell doesn’t need to name “liberalism” or “decadence”; “Hollywood” does the work as a coded shorthand, especially for the Christian Right audience he helped galvanize.
Context matters: by the late 20th century, Scientology’s public profile was disproportionately celebrity-driven, while Falwell’s broader project was to position conservative Christianity as the authentic mainstream against coastal cultural power. The line weaponizes unfamiliarity as evidence. If you only “see” them, the implication goes, they must be an illusion - or a marketing scheme - and whatever they believe can be dismissed as performance rather than conviction.
The subtext is twofold. First, Scientology is reduced to celebrity PR, not a faith with congregants, practices, or community. Second, Hollywood becomes the delivery system for moral contamination: not a workplace, but a screen that projects values into homes. Falwell doesn’t need to name “liberalism” or “decadence”; “Hollywood” does the work as a coded shorthand, especially for the Christian Right audience he helped galvanize.
Context matters: by the late 20th century, Scientology’s public profile was disproportionately celebrity-driven, while Falwell’s broader project was to position conservative Christianity as the authentic mainstream against coastal cultural power. The line weaponizes unfamiliarity as evidence. If you only “see” them, the implication goes, they must be an illusion - or a marketing scheme - and whatever they believe can be dismissed as performance rather than conviction.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|
More Quotes by Jerry
Add to List
