"I don't think of sex as a self-destructive impulse"
About this Quote
Gunn’s line lands like a quiet rebuttal to an entire mid-century moral machinery: the idea that sex, especially queer sex, is inherently a kind of doom. The phrasing is disarmingly plain - not lyrical, not defensive, just a refusal to accept the standard script. “I don’t think” matters as much as “sex.” He’s not issuing a manifesto; he’s asserting a stance of perception, a practiced mental discipline against inherited shame.
The key move is in the target: “self-destructive impulse.” That’s a clinical, almost psychiatric label, the sort of language institutions use to turn pleasure into pathology. Gunn repurposes it as something he can decline. The subtext is both personal and political: if desire is framed as self-harm, then the desiring subject is treated as someone to be managed, corrected, or pitied. Gunn’s sentence insists on a different model of the self, one capable of risk without being reducible to damage.
Context sharpens the stakes. Gunn came of age when homosexuality was still criminalized and widely medicalized; later, the AIDS crisis amplified narratives equating sex with death. Against that backdrop, the line reads less like naïveté than a principled resistance to fatalism. It also reflects Gunn’s broader aesthetic: a poet drawn to bodily experience, urban subcultures, and the hard-earned clarity of naming what you feel without letting the culture pre-name it for you. The intent isn’t to sanitize sex; it’s to deny the convenience of calling it ruin.
The key move is in the target: “self-destructive impulse.” That’s a clinical, almost psychiatric label, the sort of language institutions use to turn pleasure into pathology. Gunn repurposes it as something he can decline. The subtext is both personal and political: if desire is framed as self-harm, then the desiring subject is treated as someone to be managed, corrected, or pitied. Gunn’s sentence insists on a different model of the self, one capable of risk without being reducible to damage.
Context sharpens the stakes. Gunn came of age when homosexuality was still criminalized and widely medicalized; later, the AIDS crisis amplified narratives equating sex with death. Against that backdrop, the line reads less like naïveté than a principled resistance to fatalism. It also reflects Gunn’s broader aesthetic: a poet drawn to bodily experience, urban subcultures, and the hard-earned clarity of naming what you feel without letting the culture pre-name it for you. The intent isn’t to sanitize sex; it’s to deny the convenience of calling it ruin.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Thom
Add to List





