"I don't think Post often came to Princeton during the '30s. I can't remember ever seeing him in Princeton"
About this Quote
Mathematicians rarely throw punches in public, so Kleene's mild phrasing lands like a quiet deposition. "I don't think" and "I can't remember" sound evasive, but they function as something sharper: the careful language of someone protecting precision while still drawing a boundary around the historical record. In an era when Princeton in the 1930s has been mythologized as the nerve center of modern logic, this is a deflating, almost antiseptic correction.
The immediate context is the orbit of foundational logic: Emil Post, a towering figure in computability, is often grouped with the Princeton scene that included Church, Gödel's visits, and the Institute's gravitational pull. Kleene, himself central to recursive function theory, is implicitly policing a narrative that likes its geniuses clustered in one glamorous place. The subtext is less gossip than provenance: if Post wasn't around, then the cross-pollination people assume (ideas traded in hallways, seminars, smoke-filled offices) should not be smuggled into our understanding of how results emerged.
Kleene's restraint also signals academic ethics. He's not claiming Post never came; he's refusing to certify a story he can't personally support. It's a historian's impulse inside a participant's voice: memory as evidence, hedged and limited. That modesty is the point. In a field that prizes proof, Kleene treats biography like a theorem: don't overstate what you can't justify, even if the legend would be more satisfying.
The immediate context is the orbit of foundational logic: Emil Post, a towering figure in computability, is often grouped with the Princeton scene that included Church, Gödel's visits, and the Institute's gravitational pull. Kleene, himself central to recursive function theory, is implicitly policing a narrative that likes its geniuses clustered in one glamorous place. The subtext is less gossip than provenance: if Post wasn't around, then the cross-pollination people assume (ideas traded in hallways, seminars, smoke-filled offices) should not be smuggled into our understanding of how results emerged.
Kleene's restraint also signals academic ethics. He's not claiming Post never came; he's refusing to certify a story he can't personally support. It's a historian's impulse inside a participant's voice: memory as evidence, hedged and limited. That modesty is the point. In a field that prizes proof, Kleene treats biography like a theorem: don't overstate what you can't justify, even if the legend would be more satisfying.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nostalgia |
|---|
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List
