"I don't think religious groups should be allowed to apply for federal funds to start new ministries they have not been doing before the funding was available"
About this Quote
Falwell is drawing a line that sounds procedural but is really about power: government money should not become seed capital for proselytizing. The phrasing is careful, almost lawyerly. He does not argue that religious groups should be barred from federal funds outright; he argues against using federal funds to invent "new ministries" that magically appear once the checkbook opens. That distinction lets him defend a place for faith-based groups in the public square while insulating religion from the corrupting incentives of grant culture.
The intent reads as both moral and strategic. As a clergyman who built a movement around religious influence, Falwell knew how quickly a mission can be distorted when it starts chasing funding streams. His subtext: if ministry becomes a government-funded growth strategy, it stops being ministry and becomes a subsidized marketing campaign, one that invites predictable backlash and church-state litigation.
The context is the late-20th-century rise of the Religious Right and, later, the policy push toward faith-based initiatives that culminated in the Bush-era Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. Falwell's skepticism shows an internal debate conservatives rarely get credit for: not whether religion belongs in civic life, but whether federal partnership dilutes religious legitimacy and turns churches into contractors.
His sentence also smuggles in a test of authenticity: do the work first, then seek support. It's a guardrail against opportunism - and a bid to keep religious authority from looking like it has to be underwritten by Washington.
The intent reads as both moral and strategic. As a clergyman who built a movement around religious influence, Falwell knew how quickly a mission can be distorted when it starts chasing funding streams. His subtext: if ministry becomes a government-funded growth strategy, it stops being ministry and becomes a subsidized marketing campaign, one that invites predictable backlash and church-state litigation.
The context is the late-20th-century rise of the Religious Right and, later, the policy push toward faith-based initiatives that culminated in the Bush-era Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. Falwell's skepticism shows an internal debate conservatives rarely get credit for: not whether religion belongs in civic life, but whether federal partnership dilutes religious legitimacy and turns churches into contractors.
His sentence also smuggles in a test of authenticity: do the work first, then seek support. It's a guardrail against opportunism - and a bid to keep religious authority from looking like it has to be underwritten by Washington.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Jerry
Add to List
