Daily Inspiration Quote by Jerry Falwell

Falwell is drawing a line that sounds procedural but is really about power: government money should not become seed capital for proselytizing. The phrasing is careful, almost lawyerly. He does not argue that religious groups should be barred from federal funds outright; he argues against using federal funds to invent "new ministries" that magically appear once the checkbook opens. That distinction lets him defend a place for faith-based groups in the public square while insulating religion from the corrupting incentives of grant culture.

The intent reads as both moral and strategic. As a clergyman who built a movement around religious influence, Falwell knew how quickly a mission can be distorted when it starts chasing funding streams. His subtext: if ministry becomes a government-funded growth strategy, it stops being ministry and becomes a subsidized marketing campaign, one that invites predictable backlash and church-state litigation.

The context is the late-20th-century rise of the Religious Right and, later, the policy push toward faith-based initiatives that culminated in the Bush-era Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. Falwell's skepticism shows an internal debate conservatives rarely get credit for: not whether religion belongs in civic life, but whether federal partnership dilutes religious legitimacy and turns churches into contractors.

His sentence also smuggles in a test of authenticity: do the work first, then seek support. It's a guardrail against opportunism - and a bid to keep religious authority from looking like it has to be underwritten by Washington.