"I don't think that people in America are really given enough information about the Third World"
About this Quote
There is a quiet accusation baked into Martin Sheen's plainspoken line: ignorance in America isn't just a personal failing, it's a managed condition. He frames it carefully as a deficit of access rather than a deficit of compassion. "People in America" softens the target (it's not you, it's us), while "really given enough information" points the finger at gatekeepers - newsrooms, schools, politicians - who decide what counts as relevant. The passive construction matters. It implies something withheld, not simply overlooked.
In the late Cold War and post-Vietnam media landscape that shaped Sheen's activism, "Third World" wasn't a neutral geography term; it was a moral and political category, shorthand for places where US policy was often loud in effect but quiet in coverage. Sheen is calling out the asymmetry: Americans feel the consequences of domestic debates immediately, while the costs exported abroad arrive as blurry headlines, if they arrive at all. That gap makes it easier to sell interventions as abstractions - "stability", "freedom", "interests" - without showing the bodies, the budgets, the displaced.
Coming from an actor, the line also reads as a statement about storytelling power. Sheen built a career on narratives that make distant lives legible. Here he argues that what Americans lack isn't intelligence; it's a steady diet of human detail. The subtext is blunt: you can't consent to what you can't see, and not seeing is a political advantage for the people doing the deciding.
In the late Cold War and post-Vietnam media landscape that shaped Sheen's activism, "Third World" wasn't a neutral geography term; it was a moral and political category, shorthand for places where US policy was often loud in effect but quiet in coverage. Sheen is calling out the asymmetry: Americans feel the consequences of domestic debates immediately, while the costs exported abroad arrive as blurry headlines, if they arrive at all. That gap makes it easier to sell interventions as abstractions - "stability", "freedom", "interests" - without showing the bodies, the budgets, the displaced.
Coming from an actor, the line also reads as a statement about storytelling power. Sheen built a career on narratives that make distant lives legible. Here he argues that what Americans lack isn't intelligence; it's a steady diet of human detail. The subtext is blunt: you can't consent to what you can't see, and not seeing is a political advantage for the people doing the deciding.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List




