"I don't think the author should make the reader do that much work to remember who somebody is"
About this Quote
There is a blunt democratizing impulse in Kevin J. Anderson's line: a refusal to treat confusion as sophistication. In an era where some literary prestige is still tethered to “productive difficulty,” he plants a flag for the reader as customer, collaborator, and time-strapped human being. The intent is practical craft advice, but it’s also a small cultural critique of books that weaponize opacity - sprawling casts, interchangeable names, and amnesia-inducing viewpoint churn - then congratulate themselves for it.
Anderson comes out of the industrial side of storytelling: tie-in universes, long series, genre ecosystems where momentum is sacred and the audience often arrives midstream. In that context, “work” is less about interpretive challenge and more about clerical labor. If a reader is flipping back pages to re-identify “that guy from three chapters ago,” the spell is broken. The subtext is almost screenwriterly: narrative should be a smooth interface. Any friction that doesn’t pay off emotionally or thematically is bad design.
There’s also a quiet ethics claim here. Readers aren’t failing when they forget; authors are failing when they don’t seed recognition - through distinctive characterization, strategic reminders, clean scene architecture. The best stories make you feel smart without making you do homework. Anderson’s point isn’t anti-ambition; it’s anti-sloppiness disguised as “trusting the reader.”
Anderson comes out of the industrial side of storytelling: tie-in universes, long series, genre ecosystems where momentum is sacred and the audience often arrives midstream. In that context, “work” is less about interpretive challenge and more about clerical labor. If a reader is flipping back pages to re-identify “that guy from three chapters ago,” the spell is broken. The subtext is almost screenwriterly: narrative should be a smooth interface. Any friction that doesn’t pay off emotionally or thematically is bad design.
There’s also a quiet ethics claim here. Readers aren’t failing when they forget; authors are failing when they don’t seed recognition - through distinctive characterization, strategic reminders, clean scene architecture. The best stories make you feel smart without making you do homework. Anderson’s point isn’t anti-ambition; it’s anti-sloppiness disguised as “trusting the reader.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Kevin
Add to List






