"I don't think the British carry a historical consciousness either"
About this Quote
A poet accusing a nation of amnesia is never just talking about memory; he is talking about power. Tom Paulin's line, tossed off with the casual brutality of a dinner-party verdict, aims at a particular British talent: treating history as pageantry rather than a ledger. "Historical consciousness" isn't trivia or nostalgia; it's the habit of feeling the past as an active moral pressure. By saying the British "don't carry" it, Paulin frames history as a weight other societies are forced to bear, while Britain, cushioned by institutions and imperial afterglow, gets to travel light.
The intent is corrective and needling. Paulin, a Northern Irish poet shaped by the Troubles, speaks from a place where history is not a museum but a trigger. In that context, British public culture can look evasive: conflict recast as "ancient hatreds", empire softened into "shared heritage", violence laundered through bureaucratic language. The subtext is that British identity often survives by aestheticizing its own story - costumes, ceremonies, WW2 myth - while resisting the more corrosive chapters that would demand accountability.
The phrasing matters. "I don't think" is a rhetorical feint, a mock modesty that makes the claim sound conversational even as it lands like an indictment. "Either" implies comparison: others may lack it too, but Britain, which likes to imagine itself uniquely mature and pragmatic, is being stripped of that self-congratulation. For a poet, it's also an argument about language: a culture that can't carry history will keep reaching for euphemism, and euphemism is where responsibility goes to hide.
The intent is corrective and needling. Paulin, a Northern Irish poet shaped by the Troubles, speaks from a place where history is not a museum but a trigger. In that context, British public culture can look evasive: conflict recast as "ancient hatreds", empire softened into "shared heritage", violence laundered through bureaucratic language. The subtext is that British identity often survives by aestheticizing its own story - costumes, ceremonies, WW2 myth - while resisting the more corrosive chapters that would demand accountability.
The phrasing matters. "I don't think" is a rhetorical feint, a mock modesty that makes the claim sound conversational even as it lands like an indictment. "Either" implies comparison: others may lack it too, but Britain, which likes to imagine itself uniquely mature and pragmatic, is being stripped of that self-congratulation. For a poet, it's also an argument about language: a culture that can't carry history will keep reaching for euphemism, and euphemism is where responsibility goes to hide.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
