"I don't think the current regime of South Korea will deal actively with the issue of North Korean defectors"
About this Quote
“I don’t think” is doing more work here than the rest of the sentence. Kim Y. Sam’s line isn’t a policy memo; it’s a controlled act of pessimism, a way to indict a government without sounding like an ideologue. The phrasing matters: “current regime” is deliberately chilly, a term more often used for adversaries than allies. It subtly strips South Korea’s administration of democratic warmth and recasts it as a self-protective machine. That choice signals not just disagreement, but distrust.
The target is also carefully framed. Kim doesn’t accuse the government of cruelty; he predicts inertia. “Deal actively” is a low bar, almost bureaucratic, implying the state could at least show procedural urgency even if it won’t show moral courage. The implication is that defectors have been reduced to a manageable “issue,” a political inconvenience shuffled between ministries, election cycles, and diplomatic calculations.
The subtext points to the quiet bargain that often shapes Seoul’s posture: defectors are human beings, but they are also walking geopolitical messages. Treat them too generously and you risk antagonizing Pyongyang or complicating inter-Korean engagement. Treat them too coldly and you betray the South’s own democratic story. Kim’s sentence presses on that hypocrisy by making passivity the scandal.
As a writer, he’s not proposing a fix; he’s staging a credibility test. If the government can’t “deal actively” with the most literal proof of North Korea’s failures, what exactly is its North Korea policy for: people, or optics?
The target is also carefully framed. Kim doesn’t accuse the government of cruelty; he predicts inertia. “Deal actively” is a low bar, almost bureaucratic, implying the state could at least show procedural urgency even if it won’t show moral courage. The implication is that defectors have been reduced to a manageable “issue,” a political inconvenience shuffled between ministries, election cycles, and diplomatic calculations.
The subtext points to the quiet bargain that often shapes Seoul’s posture: defectors are human beings, but they are also walking geopolitical messages. Treat them too generously and you risk antagonizing Pyongyang or complicating inter-Korean engagement. Treat them too coldly and you betray the South’s own democratic story. Kim’s sentence presses on that hypocrisy by making passivity the scandal.
As a writer, he’s not proposing a fix; he’s staging a credibility test. If the government can’t “deal actively” with the most literal proof of North Korea’s failures, what exactly is its North Korea policy for: people, or optics?
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kim
Add to List

