"I don't think very many people would accuse Paula Zahn of being a conservative"
About this Quote
Brit Hume’s line is a piece of Beltway jiu-jitsu: it sounds like a casual aside, but it’s doing heavy rhetorical lifting. By choosing the phrase “accuse” instead of “call” or “consider,” he frames “being a conservative” as a charge people might level, not a neutral descriptor. Conservatism becomes the thing you’d have to answer for, an insinuation rather than an identity. That one verb quietly positions the cultural default as liberal, while making conservative affiliation feel like a stigma in mainstream newsrooms.
The name-drop matters, too. Paula Zahn wasn’t just any journalist; she was a high-profile, “straight news” anchor associated with a polished, middle-of-the-road broadcast aesthetic. Invoking her is a strategic appeal to common sense: if even someone as unthreateningly conventional as Zahn wouldn’t be “accused” of conservatism, the implication is that the media ecosystem is tilted enough that conservatism reads as aberrant.
Contextually, Hume (a prominent conservative media figure) is likely using Zahn as a benchmark in an argument about perceived bias: not to litigate her reporting, but to triangulate what counts as “normal” ideology on television. The subtext is less about Zahn than about the audience’s suspicion that “objective” news often tracks a culturally liberal sensibility. It’s a neat move: he defends conservatives by suggesting they’re outnumbered, and he critiques mainstream media without needing to prove malice or cite a single segment. The line wins by implying the conclusion is already obvious.
The name-drop matters, too. Paula Zahn wasn’t just any journalist; she was a high-profile, “straight news” anchor associated with a polished, middle-of-the-road broadcast aesthetic. Invoking her is a strategic appeal to common sense: if even someone as unthreateningly conventional as Zahn wouldn’t be “accused” of conservatism, the implication is that the media ecosystem is tilted enough that conservatism reads as aberrant.
Contextually, Hume (a prominent conservative media figure) is likely using Zahn as a benchmark in an argument about perceived bias: not to litigate her reporting, but to triangulate what counts as “normal” ideology on television. The subtext is less about Zahn than about the audience’s suspicion that “objective” news often tracks a culturally liberal sensibility. It’s a neat move: he defends conservatives by suggesting they’re outnumbered, and he critiques mainstream media without needing to prove malice or cite a single segment. The line wins by implying the conclusion is already obvious.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Brit
Add to List




