"I dream that someday the step between my mind and my finger will no longer be needed. And that simply by blinking my eyes, I shall make pictures. Then, I think, I shall really have become a photographer"
About this Quote
Eisenstaedt is fantasizing about the ultimate shortcut in image-making: not better cameras, not sharper lenses, but the removal of the last stubborn piece of friction between perception and proof. That "step between my mind and my finger" is the whole messy chain of translation that defines photography as a craft: deciding, aiming, focusing, timing, pressing, hoping. He frames that gap as almost an impurity, a mechanical delay that can dull intuition. The blink is a sly choice, too. Blinking is involuntary, intimate, and fast; it suggests photography as reflex rather than production, a way of seeing so trained it becomes bodily.
The subtext is both humble and quietly competitive. Eisenstaedt, the Life magazine maestro of the "candid" moment, built a reputation on making split-second scenes look inevitable. By longing to eliminate the finger, he admits how much of his work depends on wrestling chance. A photographer, in this view, isnt someone with gear. Its someone whose inner edit is so immediate that the camera feels like an extension of cognition.
Context matters: Eisenstaedt comes from the era when photography was still fighting for its status as art and not just documentation. His line pushes that argument without saying it outright. If the ideal photograph is thought made visible at the speed of a blink, then authorship lives in the mind, not the apparatus. Its a romantic proposition, but also a modern one: a premonition of todays frictionless capture culture, where we can make images instantly and endlessly, yet still struggle to make them mean anything. Eisenstaedt hints that the real barrier was never the finger. It was the seeing.
The subtext is both humble and quietly competitive. Eisenstaedt, the Life magazine maestro of the "candid" moment, built a reputation on making split-second scenes look inevitable. By longing to eliminate the finger, he admits how much of his work depends on wrestling chance. A photographer, in this view, isnt someone with gear. Its someone whose inner edit is so immediate that the camera feels like an extension of cognition.
Context matters: Eisenstaedt comes from the era when photography was still fighting for its status as art and not just documentation. His line pushes that argument without saying it outright. If the ideal photograph is thought made visible at the speed of a blink, then authorship lives in the mind, not the apparatus. Its a romantic proposition, but also a modern one: a premonition of todays frictionless capture culture, where we can make images instantly and endlessly, yet still struggle to make them mean anything. Eisenstaedt hints that the real barrier was never the finger. It was the seeing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Alfred
Add to List




