"I felt a responsibility to present a viable alternative to the popular electric sound"
About this Quote
Ron Carter’s line lands like a quiet rebuttal in the middle of jazz’s loudest argument: when everyone turns the amp up, someone has to make the acoustic case feel like the future, not a museum piece. “Responsibility” is the tell. He’s not describing a personal preference; he’s framing a cultural job. In the late 60s and 70s, electric instruments weren’t just new tools, they were a new ideology: volume, mass appeal, rock-adjacent swagger, a different kind of virtuosity. If you were a working jazz musician, the electric wave could read like inevitability.
Carter’s phrasing sidesteps nostalgia. He doesn’t say “protect” or “preserve” the acoustic tradition. He says “present a viable alternative,” as if the public is a jury and the acoustic bass has to earn its relevance. That’s a musician thinking like an editor: the marketplace is already running a headline (“Electric is modern”), and he’s insisting on a counter-narrative strong enough to compete on the same page.
The subtext is strategic, not purist. Carter isn’t condemning electric music; he’s acknowledging its popularity and meeting it with professionalism: better time, better note choices, better sound, better leadership. “Viable” implies survival metrics - gigs, records, audiences, influence. It’s also a statement about identity: jazz can evolve without surrendering its core acoustic conversation. In a period when “selling out” was a constant accusation, Carter positions himself as something rarer: an artist who treats tradition as an active, persuasive performance, not a static inheritance.
Carter’s phrasing sidesteps nostalgia. He doesn’t say “protect” or “preserve” the acoustic tradition. He says “present a viable alternative,” as if the public is a jury and the acoustic bass has to earn its relevance. That’s a musician thinking like an editor: the marketplace is already running a headline (“Electric is modern”), and he’s insisting on a counter-narrative strong enough to compete on the same page.
The subtext is strategic, not purist. Carter isn’t condemning electric music; he’s acknowledging its popularity and meeting it with professionalism: better time, better note choices, better sound, better leadership. “Viable” implies survival metrics - gigs, records, audiences, influence. It’s also a statement about identity: jazz can evolve without surrendering its core acoustic conversation. In a period when “selling out” was a constant accusation, Carter positions himself as something rarer: an artist who treats tradition as an active, persuasive performance, not a static inheritance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Ron
Add to List




