"I find war detestable but those who praise it without participating in it even more so"
About this Quote
Rolland’s line isn’t pacifism as perfume; it’s pacifism with teeth. War is “detestable” in the straightforward, moral sense, but the real target is the second clause: the comfortable chorus of admirers who treat violence like a theory. By making “even more so” the pivot, Rolland shifts the scandal from the battlefield to the bleachers. The most obscene figure here isn’t the soldier; it’s the civilian aesthete of carnage, the commentator for whom other people’s bodies are the medium of national meaning.
The intent is surgical: to expose how praise functions as a social alibi. If you can speak of war as noble, cleansing, inevitable, you get to harvest its supposed virtues - courage, sacrifice, unity - without paying the physical price. Rolland’s subtext is that the rhetoric of honor often masks a deeper desire: to feel righteous, manly, or historically important at someone else’s expense. Participation becomes the ethical boundary he draws not to romanticize combat, but to revoke the innocence of those who incite it from a safe distance.
Context matters. Rolland writes from a Europe that had made militarism fashionable and would soon make it catastrophic. As a French novelist and public intellectual shaped by the Dreyfus era and the First World War’s slaughter, he’s arguing against the salon-nationalism that helped march millions into trenches. The sentence works because it weaponizes a simple fairness test: if you demand blood, whose blood is it?
The intent is surgical: to expose how praise functions as a social alibi. If you can speak of war as noble, cleansing, inevitable, you get to harvest its supposed virtues - courage, sacrifice, unity - without paying the physical price. Rolland’s subtext is that the rhetoric of honor often masks a deeper desire: to feel righteous, manly, or historically important at someone else’s expense. Participation becomes the ethical boundary he draws not to romanticize combat, but to revoke the innocence of those who incite it from a safe distance.
Context matters. Rolland writes from a Europe that had made militarism fashionable and would soon make it catastrophic. As a French novelist and public intellectual shaped by the Dreyfus era and the First World War’s slaughter, he’s arguing against the salon-nationalism that helped march millions into trenches. The sentence works because it weaponizes a simple fairness test: if you demand blood, whose blood is it?
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Au-dessus de la mêlée (Above the Battle), essay by Romain Rolland, 1915 — pacifist essay commonly cited as the source; English translations vary in exact wording. |
More Quotes by Romain
Add to List












