"I fully realize that the new organization is a human rather than a perfect instrumentality for the attainment of its great objective. As time goes on it will, I am sure, be improved"
About this Quote
A diplomatic shrug disguised as reassurance, Hull’s line is built to do two jobs at once: lower expectations and keep the project alive. The “new organization” is almost certainly the United Nations, born from wartime exhaustion and the fresh memory of the League of Nations’ failure. Hull doesn’t sell it as a gleaming solution; he sells it as a workable machine assembled by imperfect hands. That’s not modesty. It’s strategy.
The key move is the phrase “human rather than a perfect instrumentality.” “Human” sounds warm, even forgiving, but it’s also a preemptive defense against the inevitabilities of bureaucracy: vetoes, horse-trading, procedural gridlock, and nations treating ideals as bargaining chips. Hull is telling skeptics, and especially Americans wary of entanglement, that disappointment should not be confused with betrayal. If it creaks, that’s proof it’s real.
The subtext is political triage. Post-1945 internationalism needed public consent, congressional buy-in, and allied trust. By admitting imperfection up front, Hull narrows the target for critics who would otherwise demand utopia and then condemn the institution for failing to deliver it. The final promise - “As time goes on… it will… be improved” - shifts the burden onto patience and participation. The organization’s legitimacy becomes iterative: not a constitution handed down from on high, but a living compromise that can be tightened, amended, and strengthened.
Hull’s intent isn’t to inspire awe; it’s to make permanence plausible. Imperfection becomes the argument for staying in the room.
The key move is the phrase “human rather than a perfect instrumentality.” “Human” sounds warm, even forgiving, but it’s also a preemptive defense against the inevitabilities of bureaucracy: vetoes, horse-trading, procedural gridlock, and nations treating ideals as bargaining chips. Hull is telling skeptics, and especially Americans wary of entanglement, that disappointment should not be confused with betrayal. If it creaks, that’s proof it’s real.
The subtext is political triage. Post-1945 internationalism needed public consent, congressional buy-in, and allied trust. By admitting imperfection up front, Hull narrows the target for critics who would otherwise demand utopia and then condemn the institution for failing to deliver it. The final promise - “As time goes on… it will… be improved” - shifts the burden onto patience and participation. The organization’s legitimacy becomes iterative: not a constitution handed down from on high, but a living compromise that can be tightened, amended, and strengthened.
Hull’s intent isn’t to inspire awe; it’s to make permanence plausible. Imperfection becomes the argument for staying in the room.
Quote Details
| Topic | Management |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Cordell
Add to List




