"I got all the respect in the world for the front-runners in this race, but ask yourself: If we replace a Democratic insider with a Republican insider, you think we're really going to change Washington, D.C.? You don't have to settle for Washington and Wall Street insiders who supported the Wall Street bailout and the Obamacare individual mandate"
About this Quote
Perry’s move here is classic insurgent theater: he flatters his rivals (“all the respect in the world”) while immediately stripping them of legitimacy. That opening is a verbal handshake that turns into a wrist lock. It lets him sound collegial even as he paints the “front-runners” as identical, swap-a-Democrat-for-a-Republican mannequins who’ll keep Washington’s machinery humming.
The key phrase is “insider,” repeated like a drumbeat. It’s not a policy category; it’s a moral one. Perry isn’t arguing that specific votes were wrong so much as that the people who cast them belong to a corrupt caste. The question he poses (“you think we’re really going to change Washington, D.C.?”) is staged to make agreement feel like common sense, not persuasion. If you answer honestly, you’ve already joined his side.
Then he stitches together two hot-button grievances of the era: the Wall Street bailout (a Tea Party scar) and the “Obamacare individual mandate” (a conservative rallying cry). The subtext is surgical: establishment Republicans are tainted not just by Democrats but by complicity in big-government, big-finance deals. “Washington and Wall Street” works as a single villain, a merged brand of elite impunity.
Context matters: this is Perry trying to enter a Republican primary lane dominated by anti-establishment energy while front-runners carried votes or associations that could be framed as betrayal. He’s selling not a blueprint but a purge, with “you don’t have to settle” pitched as consumer freedom for a party tired of buying the same product in new packaging.
The key phrase is “insider,” repeated like a drumbeat. It’s not a policy category; it’s a moral one. Perry isn’t arguing that specific votes were wrong so much as that the people who cast them belong to a corrupt caste. The question he poses (“you think we’re really going to change Washington, D.C.?”) is staged to make agreement feel like common sense, not persuasion. If you answer honestly, you’ve already joined his side.
Then he stitches together two hot-button grievances of the era: the Wall Street bailout (a Tea Party scar) and the “Obamacare individual mandate” (a conservative rallying cry). The subtext is surgical: establishment Republicans are tainted not just by Democrats but by complicity in big-government, big-finance deals. “Washington and Wall Street” works as a single villain, a merged brand of elite impunity.
Context matters: this is Perry trying to enter a Republican primary lane dominated by anti-establishment energy while front-runners carried votes or associations that could be framed as betrayal. He’s selling not a blueprint but a purge, with “you don’t have to settle” pitched as consumer freedom for a party tired of buying the same product in new packaging.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Rick
Add to List



